On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:39, Mikus Grinbergs <[email protected]> wrote: >> The journal's search and browsing capabilities are less useful if all >> entries are named the same regardless of their actual content or >> meaning to the user. > > What I cannot understand is why, after some two years of > development, the only view of Journal entries that has been > implemented is by "time sequence".
We are waiting for your patches ;) > If the user wants to pick something from among many entries of the > same type (e.g., "audio"), he either has to look through them all, > or has to remember an explicit "string" to search for. If the > entries could optionally be 'sorted' (for instance, alphabetized), > it would be easier to see "what is there and what is not". I frankly don't see how sorting by name would help you there, but that feature is already planned, only that we haven't had nobody to work on it. Regards, Tomeu _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
