I take full responsibility for starting the thread Mike is upset about. _Every_ action I make as part of Sugar Labs involves four steps:
1. Seek opinions of people I trust about the topic at hand. 2. Public summarize what I have learned on IAEP. 3. Wait for a consensus to form. 4. Take action. This issues is no different then any other. I have talked to people from deployments, people from distributions, OEMs, VARs, and other developers. I am working on the summary to propose to on iaep for discussion. If I am wrong, please prove me wrong by implementing a better solution. I would much rather Sugar Labs have a working solution... and I am wrong yet again. david On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Ivan Krstić <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2009, at 8:14 PM, Walter Bender wrote: >> Why don't we appoint you as a monitor of the slobs list. > > As I understand it, the thread in question wasn't ever *on* the list, > but was carried out through private CC. We set up the slobs@ list > precisely to avoid e-mails going through private CC, which obviously > escape all transparency mechanisms that are in place; why did this > thread not take place on the list? > > -- > Ivan Krstić <[email protected]> | http://radian.org > > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
