Hi Jameson,

Hope you don't mind, just forwarding this to IAEP as it is something important I missed from my overview:

Begin forwarded message:

From: Jameson Quinn <[email protected]>
Date: 18 March 2009 17:15:29 GMT
To: Gary C Martin <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [IAEP] aslo categories

My suggestion was not a literacy category, but 3 of them: beginner- literacy, intermediate-literacy, and high-literacy. Something like a wikipedia slice would be high-literacy, something like paint would be beginner literacy. This would let teachers search for things suitable for their age ranges. These categories would not be exclusive with the other categories.

Yep, so a thread of the meeting was about the possibility of using the ASLO category feature as a way to indicate 'level', being careful not to use 'age' as the level factor as it (seems to be) pedagogically rough terrain to suggest age has anything to do with learning ability.

/me ducks and runs for cover.

Regards,
--Gary

Jameson

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Gary C Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi David,

On 18 Mar 2009, at 15:19, David Farning wrote:

> Would anyone like to re-visit the activity categories on aslo at
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/ .
>
> Carol recently pointed out that documents should become "reading &
> writing"? "words"? Needs to encompass word games,
> reading, writing... in http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/448 .
>
> I believe Tomeu pulled the current categories straight from
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/All .

Sorry, I was meant to be following up on this from last weeks
ActivityTeam meeting, where we didn't get to any specific conclusions
and had to move on with the agenda. Note that the current ASLO allows
a developer to pick upto 3 categories for their Activity to be tagged
in, I quite like the restriction, but I understand it is possible to
take this limit off.

Here's the feedback so far:

Current ASLO (from original OLPC wiki): Search & Discovery, Documents,
News, Chat, mail and talk, Media creation, Programming, Maths &
Science, Maps & Geography, Media players, Games, Teacher tools.

Gabriel Eirea: Artistic, Natural sciences, Social sciences, Language,
Mathematics, Second language/Foreign languages.

Eben Eliason: Math, Science, Language, Artistic, Programming,
Communication, Neighbourhood, Writing

garycmartin (me): Reading, Writing, Art, Maths, Science, Programming,
Geography, Communication, Games.

nrp: Utilities.

I also liked the suggestion for a Literacy category, that could
potentially be used to replace Reading and Writing (keeping the list
shorter). Also the terms Numbers, and Words came up as possible
alternatives, and I just noticed we'd missed Music.

So, summing up so far, this could give us something like:

    Art
    Communication
    Games
    Geography
    Literacy
    Maths
    Music
    Programming
    Science
    Utilities

I'd love to see some more feedback on this so we get a good robust set
of categories with an educational slant. Now ideally, actual users
would provide the tagging information for Activities, but that's a
whole 'nother ball game to get into ;-)

Regards,
--Gary

> thanks
> david
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> [email protected]
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
[email protected]
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
[email protected]
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Reply via email to