On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:01:58PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Wade Brainerd <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Eben Eliason <[email protected]> wrote: > > certainly provide a future path for activity versioning, promote the > > creation and modification of activities to be at the same level as > > creating and modifying activity instances, allow users a way to > > transfer their created activities around, etc. > > All of this, again, I see the current Journal handling just fine. If > you modify an activity bundle, you (once we support it) create a new > version of it. When you attempt to instantiate it, the bundle is > silently unpacked in the background. The zipped bundle is what you see > in the Journal, is what you click to start the activity, is what you'd > want to send to a friend, or post for download, etc. All of these > things are already facilitated by the Journal. > > The big missing piece, I find, is the lack of a Bundle activity which > allows kids to peek inside and rearrange zip and other bundle formats. > The Develop activity already supports opening activity bundles from > the Journal.
Well we are talking about the same thing... but from the opposite sides :) My concern is just eliminate conception of "Bundle in Journal" - we could have only Activities - .xo bundles is only format to transport activities between friends(I include ASLO to this number:), technically we could store original bundles(but not showing them in Journal) to have "revert to original" feature -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
