On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 02:33:30PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > All, > > The last few emails on the Library Activity suggest that people are > looking at Library as a way of organizing their various Journal content > just as much if not more than as a way to share said content. > > As far as organizing content goes, I like what Calibre does better than > the tree view you seem to be proposing. What I would like is a tabular > format where you can sort ascending or descending on any column, and > filter on any column. Both Calibre and iTunes have a view like this and > for me it works. I would have columns for Title, Author, Subject, and > Type, where Author and Subject are optional. > > A tree structure is good for hiding stuff you don't want to look at. If > you want to browse through everything (expand the entire tree) it wastes > vertical space.
Well, in my mind the best solution is let user choose the right way :) So Library will have several tags views * cloud of tags * tree of tags * plane list of objects i.e. w/o any tags -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep