On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Luke Faraone<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:19, Benjamin M. Schwartz > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Last year we used http://selectricity.org/ , largely without incident. Do >> you have a reason to do otherwise this year? > > This reason: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 17:51, Walter > Bender <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> there was some concern that Selectricity had some flaws and security holes > > > Also having a 3rd party allows for greater accountability and transparency. >> >> Also, the Schulze method can only be used to elect a single winner. It >> >> does not describe any mechanism for multi-winner elections such as this >> one.
on the contrary, it works very well for multi-winner elections. -walter > > Ok, then. What would you recommend? > -- > Luke Faraone > http://luke.faraone.cc > > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
