Mel Chua wrote: >> For the trademark committee, one workflow that I'd personally be happy >> with is: >> >> * the trademark committee will set the trademark policy, and their >> policy will be backed up by SLOBS as the official policy. >> >> * separately, we'd need to decide whether we actually want to (and can >> afford to) spend the money to perform yearly trademark registration. >> It'd be good to get advice on the consensus for that from the >> trademark committee, but the purchase sounds like something that >> SLOBS should keep the ability to make a final decision on. (Since >> it depends upon how much money's in the bank account at the time, >> and what the *other* committees think we ought to spend it on. :) >> >> How does that sound? > > +1 to both procedures from me, fwiw. I'll also officially (instead of > informally) volunteer for the election committee here, if SLOBs is OK > with a candidate taking that on, since nobody else seems to be > stepping up. > > --Mel
+1 from me, too! :) Well, Chris is right, originally I was volunteering for the committee itself. I'm a bit short of time right now (school's running again), but I could still work on it. Is there anybody else interested in joining this committee? --Sebastian _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
