On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Tomeu Vizoso<[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see where we disagree any of us, so maybe I'm explaining badly > myself. Let me try again. > > I agree that the journal should be a journal, thus primarily about > actions and events and not about static pieces of data or code.
You're right, and I got lost in the description of a more granular Journal. Re-reading, it makes sense. > And less directly related, I referred to a new view in the shell for > the contents of the file system. This is not strictly needed by the > journal concept but has been shown useful as a stepping stone between > the journal and the underlying file system and for sharing files with > non-Sugar systems. Having this view allows us to have a real journal > without losing needed functionality. That's excellent -- with Sugar becoming more usable on mixed-use scenarios (where the user may access other desktop environments) such as Fedora 11 and recent Debian&Ubuntu, and OLPC shipping an OS that facilitates that switching, having a Journal that can go hunting in ~ is incredibly valuable. (as is a gnome fs plugin for the journal :-) ) m -- [email protected] [email protected] -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
