On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:50:25PM -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > Fedora aims for a lightweight [compromise to foster intiatives]: > > * Special Interest Group > + Can be created by anyone > + One leader (i.e. the person who requests the mailing list) > + No governance expected or required > + No accountability in particular > + Can apply for Project status as it grows > > * Project > + Usually starts as a SIG and is, at some point, blessed by the Board > + Full governance > + Weekly meetings and minutes mandated > + Expected outcomes > + Accountability to the Board >
Those seem like what Fedora gets out of SIGs / Projects. What does the group get out of being a SIG / Project? The next question will be: what does SugarLabs want to get and give from its "Project"s. > --g Martin
pgpkYbiNICqcC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
