On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 17:50, Martin Langhoff<[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Tomeu Vizoso<[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't understand how this helps to this discussion. It's obvious > > I think Michael just means that there are hints from coming > deployments as to general priorities, and SL is setting priorities on > a different schedule. Not about doing deployment's work.
SLs is setting priorities? How so? > Of course, there are various groups with ideas as to what's important, > and one group (the doers at SL) wins by sheer force of... action. :-) The doers have asked for input on what they should work on and have setup a process for non-doers to manifest their views. Then doers have executed as much as they could. Some "non-doers" that expressed their opinions got some stuff they wanted done, the ones that didn't expressed their opinions might not have had that luck. Let me repeat that I don't think SLs is here to replace OLPC, just to provide a place for people who are investing in Sugar to do so more effectively. Regards, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David Farning _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
