On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Luke Faraone <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:18, Caroline Meeks > <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> Personally I'd like to choose >> Launch Pad. Its open source where Get Satisfaction is only free to us. >> >> However here is today's problem with LaunchPad >> >> I want to discuss a features in the roadmap/blueprint. >> > > Well, assuming we make all features have a wikipage, you can discuss it on > that wikipage. (we can later unify login between launchpad and > Wiki/Gitorious so this isn't an issue, as LP is an openID provider) > > Launchpad supports "setting the full URL for a spec", which can be any web > page. Is that satisfactory? > Unfortunately, I don't think so. Our goal is to get shy, not so invested, not so web savvy people from the field to feel comfortable giving us their opinions. I don't think going to another website, creating another account, using a non-WYSIWYG editor and changing a really official looking page is going to do that for us. We need an easy, chatty, way for people to put in their $.02. Is LaunchPad open to making changes for us? Cause its close. Really what I think I'm asking for is a "comment" and "vote" functionality on Blueprints. > > > >> I worked around by using the Whiteboard. Maybe this is good enough? >> > > Possibly. > > There seems to be no way to vote for a feature/spec. Given our current >> focus on trying to be responsive to the needs of our users this seems like a >> really important feature. >> > > Hm. I guess we could submit a request to LP asking them to add said > feature, or make it one of our tasks. > > -- > Luke Faraone > http://luke.faraone.cc > -- Caroline Meeks Solution Grove [email protected] 617-500-3488 - Office 505-213-3268 - Fax
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
