On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Gary C Martin <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Bill, > > > On 30 Aug 2009, at 01:30, Bill Kerr wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Gary C Martin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Bill, >>> >>> On 29 Aug 2009, at 14:44, Bill Kerr wrote: >>> >>> the default single click shape does not work for the box but does work >>> for >>> >>>> circle and triangle >>>> >>> >>> Just to confirm, this is tested and working. But, I think what happened >>> here is that you may have dragged a very small (too small) box first, and >>> then subsequent single clicks were then trying to clone that non drawable >>> shape. I thought I'd avoided that case by not remembering parameters for >>> shapes too small to draw, will fix this in the next release – so thanks >>> for >>> reporting it! :-) >>> >> >> the square block does work if you click on it first >> >> but try clicking on the circle, the triangle and the square in that order >> - >> the square does not create a shape by default (the others do) >> >> then exit physics and go back in >> click on the square, the triangle and circle in order - the circle does >> not >> create a shape by default (the others do) >> >> and variations of the above - sometimes the default (click shape, click >> screen, shape standard size shape created) works sometimes it doesn't >> eg. it might always work for the square but not at all for the triangle or >> circle depending on the clicking order >> >> in some cases it leaves just an arrow on the screen and the program >> crashes >> >> all of the above without me trying to create any smaller shapes >> > > Hmmm, that's really interesting. I can't reproduce any of these cases here > :-( Is anyone else able to reproduce these cases? I've tested on an XO-1 > running 0.82, XO-1 running 0.84, and a Mac running F11 and sugar-jhbuild > 0.85.x Just to help my sanity, when you next reproduce this... With the tool that > you find fails, can you click and drag to create a size of your own > choosing, and then afterwards single click to create a clone? Just to be > sure that your not managing to create a 'micro' shape as the default by > accident (yes I need to fix that case). I tried again on another USB ( I have a few different brands) and this time it behaves more like you are describing ie. I am getting microshapes, some of them quite small but which I can (sometimes) see Cloning is not reliable - it sometimes reverts to microshapes adata USB matches your description LASER USB is what I was describing earlier Lack of consistency b/w USBs is disconcerting
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
