Dennis Daniels wrote: > That's one of the reasons I was initially attracted to Sugar in that > the peer networking was built in... please tell me that one station > monitoring of all students is built in as well.
Nope. No monitoring built in. However, I have recently implemented it as an Activity called "Watch Me" [1]. > If it isn't then it > should be for the teacher's sake. 1. As a technical matter, this is not so easy over a congested wireless network. 2. We care much more about students than teachers. Is it good for the students? To understand the perspective present when Sugar was developed, consider the following paper: http://www.usenix.org/event/upsec08/tech/full_papers/patterson/patterson.pdf This paper criticizes OLPC's security design, because it would make it too easy to trace communications back to the student who issued them. Particularly in societies with oppressive governments prone to censorship, this creates a chilling effect on freedom of expression. OLPC's response was, roughly, that the author had misunderstood the design, and that cryptographic security for students against authorities was a key consideration in the design.* In other words, Sugar's design comes from a culture with a deep distrust of authority figures. I got my programming start by hacking my school's computer systems, and I'm sure the same is true of many other contributors here. You will find plenty of opposition to letting teachers watch what students are doing without permission. [1] http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4205 *: In fact, this particular cryptographic scheme was never actually implemented anyway, and I believe most collaboration traffic is still sent over the network unencrypted.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
