On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Walter Bender <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Bryan Berry <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 12:25 -0500, David Farning wrote: >>> Project/SIGs are product focused. The exist to help guide a project >>> through it's life cycle. For example, there has recently been some >>> rather heated discussions about working more closely with Qt. This is >>> an example of a idea the could start as a SIG and grow into a project >>> and be included in the Learning Platform.... if it proves useful. >> >> Sorry to have not been involved in this conversation. >> >> So it sounds to me like Karma should be an SL SIG and later an SL >> Project. I really don't have an idea of how it will be governed but I >> will leave that to later as i see how the community around it develops. >> So I guess Karma can't progress from SIG to project until the leadership >> process is defined. >> >> I feel bad because I have been putting the SL logo on the >> karmaeducation.org site. Sorry if I was using the SL branding >> prematurely. I also put the SL logo in the Karma presentations. >> > > Huh? Seems like an appropriate use of the logo to me. >
For me also, it follows perfectly the guidelines:, http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Logo#Logo_usage > -walter >> >> -- >> Bryan W. Berry >> Technology Director >> OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > > > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
