It's hard for me to understand why we are dropping so fast support for the XO-1.
It is not logical, does not make sense to drop the biggest user base Sugar has, except when we account for human feelings of pain and betrayal that accompany the lore involving OLPC and such. While Sugar, as-is, is painfully slow and flaky on the XO, it is still the very best we have, and while we could get away from it and proclaim "mission accomplished", well, that didn't work for that other guy, did it? IMHO, yes, at some moment it's "vamoose" and so on, but that should not come any earlier than when we have another, bigger thing going in terms of user base. I understand what you say, Tomeu, and I am grateful for it. I'm just afraid that, as tight as we are now, that individual would have to come from the outside, and spend a loooot of time gaining credibility, and so on, before getting to a level of effectiveness that would get the job done. Yama Tomeu Vizoso wrote: <snip> > About the particular effort of pushing forward one more stable release > for the XO-1, I strongly think we need a single individual that will > lead the effort and tie together the different teams that will be > working on it. > _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
