On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 05:37:49PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jim Simmons <[email protected]> wrote: > > My guess is that we get few reviews because you need to create an > > account on ASLO before you can do it. A normal Activity user has no > > other use for such an account. If you could post a review without > > logging in perhaps more people would do it. > > If the Browse user agent string is present, we could allow posting a > review without logging in. (Maybe even use the user's Sugar Nick if > that is available to the server) > > I bet that would be enough to stop casual spam, but I don't know how > much work it would take to implement on the ASLO side.
do you mean sugar <=> aslo account integration or just checking useragent string for spam detecting? (if sugar will be so popular and spammers will use sugarized useragent string, we won't change useragent too fast :) > > I'd love to see more reviews of my own Activities, even really > > negative ones. I've gotten some pretty good download numbers but > > without feedback the numbers don't seem real to me. > > Yeah, same here. > > Best, > Wade > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
