[adding IAEP to CC because we agreed on using only SLOBs for matters that require confidentiality]
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 17:41, Mel Chua <m...@melchua.com> wrote: > On http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Log-2010-03-12 > we agreed to schedule a conference call to see how far we could move the > trademark discussion forward before our SLOBs get-together in April. > (What are the plans for that, by the way?) I will be in Boston from 12th to 19th April, being a bit busy with GNOME stuff from 14th to 18th. Regards, Tomeu > So! > > Enter your times here: http://whenisgood.net/wtcs5t > > Results: http://whenisgood.net/wtcs5t/results/h9s4i7 > > Ground rules: No decisions will be made during this call; it is not an > official SLOBs meeting (those are still on IRC). Its purpose is to get > ideas out and to help people understand the various perspectives > surrounding this issue, so that we can have a good motion, discussion, > and resolution at a subsequent IRC SLOBs meeting. > > People who need to be on the line: > > * Karen (because we need someone who understands trademark law - I'll > send her scheduling options once the other "must be there" people have > filled in their available times, and we may just ask her to be there for > the first 10m of the call to set the scene for us, and give us an > indication of what sort of policy in what format we need to give the > SFC/SFLC. She doesn't necessarily have to be present for the subsequent > discussion.) > > * Sean (because trademark and brand are deeply intertwined) > * Walter (as the Executive Director) > * Chris (from the perspective of a long-time FOSS developer who's seen > multiple trademark policies from the open source community side) > > And then as many SLOBs as we can get. > > Questions: > > 1. Is this the right list of people that we need on the call? > 2. Is it ok for community members to dial in and listen to the call? > 3. What resources can we pull together/provide for those on the call in > order to prepare the call itself to go as productively as possible? > > Thanks, > > --Mel > _______________________________________________ > SLOBs mailing list > sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs > _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep