On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 21:11, Bert Freudenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30.04.2010, at 12:38, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> follows a plan about how to improve the situation regarding >> maintenance of our software modules. If you care about it, please >> reply even if only to say so, or even better, comment on it and >> suggest improvements. I will assume that lack of replies mean people >> don't care about it and will stop caring about it myself. > > I do care. > > We face a similar problem for Etoys, and there are even less Etoys developers > than Sugar developers. However, there are many more Squeak developers than > Etoys developers (*), so our strategy is to make it as simple to contribute > as possible, and also raise the visibility of Etoys in the larger Squeak > community. We'll see how that plays out :)
I hope SLs can also bring resources to Etoys development as we work closer to deployments, because it is an important part of what children do when they learn with Sugar. Thanks for your support, Tomeu > - Bert - > > (*) Etoys is implemented in Squeak, which is a programming environment > invented specifically to create authoring tools for "children of all ages", > but nowadays is used for all sorts of development, ranging from mobile > devices to web services. > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
