El Wed, 23-06-2010 a las 09:49 -0400, Martin Langhoff escribió: > that's exactly my "side" :-) -- I see SL as the place where companies > (yours), foundations (OLPC!) and independent hackers with various > motivations meet and collaborate).
This is *exactly* how I see SL, too. Quoting Tomeu: >> If people think that SLs is a player instead of a place, then I think >> we have already lost the battle and should rethink what SLs is >> supposed to be. > My mention of "clubs" was about earlier discussion of formally > splitting a "maintenance team" vs a "development team" -- others have > called it "splitting staff". I say we only need to split git branches, > and "git checkout" the appropriate one at the appropriate time :-) This is how I feel, too. > Absolutely. Successful projects are "big tents" ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_tent ) -- > > I think most people here agree with this view, and others are ok to > tolerate it (in good big tent fashion). The board has also given a strong message in this direction by voting that Sugar Labs is not in itself a Linux distributor and can endorse any number of volunteer-supported Sugar distributions. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
