On Aug 24, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Richard A. Smith wrote: > I'm not talking about comparison to our previous mesh.
Thanks keeping me on track. > I'm talking about comparison to an AP. Overall we currently don't > have much need for "mesh" as most of our scenarios are a dense cloud > of children in the same space trying to network with each other. Fo deployments that have funding for APs there is not much need for "mesh." I would approximate that roughly 66% of our user base are in deployments that do not have funding for APs. > > The network-without-infra feature of "mesh" is certainly useful in > scenarios were you want to provide access over a wider area. Its a > very important feature of mesh but its just not the feature we need > on the ground ATM. Yet, this is a "feature," we continue to sell and a feature often requested. > However, if the same mesh smartness also gets density without using > AP's then that's a big win. Agreed! Reuben _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
