I believe that Alan has used examples like "90%" before that one can read to 
gain additional insight to his view. A quick search will provide some 
resources. Here is one I found:

http://secretgeek.net/camel_kay.asp

Hopefully that helps shed some light. 

Zachary C. Clifton

On Nov 2, 2010, at 5:31 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:

> interesting...  What about nature / nurture?
> 
> are we talking about 90% of those who actually "can", or 90% of all?
> 
> in any case, we hit very different individual learning slopes...
> 
> To follow up with the kind of example you use, today's Wall Street Journal 
> has an article on how even highly educated people in Holland don't want to 
> wear helmets when riding bikes.  So, they are "fluent" in bicycle riding but 
> somehow are not reasonable about it.  The skill is there, but a concept on 
> how your behavior hurts others (if you get injured, someone else has to share 
> in paying for it) is clearly missing - ethics...
> 
> anyway, famously, fluent in /what/?
> 
> On 11/02/2010 06:21 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. wrote:
>> Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
>>   
>>> thank you, yep, you right.
>>> 
>>> On 11/02/2010 04:40 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>>>     
>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka<[email protected]>   
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>>>> request to understand better what Alan meant by 90% fluency...
>>>>> 
>>>>>         
>>>> Fluency in 90% of the population, not "90% fluency".
>>>> 
>>>> You could want to ask what definition of 'fluency' is being used and
>>>> whether there is a reasonable test for that.
>>>>       
>> Here is my own definition: you are fluent when mechanism doesn't fight
>> higher level goals for your attention.
>> 
>> When riding a bicycle, for example, if the only thing in your mind is
>> that you want to go to the end of this block and turn left then you are
>> a fluent rider. If, in addition to that, you are also worried about
>> whether to turn the handle bar left or right in order not to fall, or
>> perhaps lean over a bit instead and whether you might be pedalling too
>> slowly then you are not fluent.
>> 
>> The problem with a lack of fluency is obvious when, even though you are
>> pleased with yourself for not having fallen, you suddenly realize that
>> you have already passed the street where you wanted to turn left. In the
>> same way, people who are not a fluent readers will find themselves very
>> tired after two pages and have no idea of what the text said.
>> 
>> -- Jecel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>> 
>>   
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> [email protected]
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
[email protected]
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Reply via email to