El 09/05/11 11:00, Mel Chua escribió:
Thanks for taking notes on the SLOBs meeting in-person, folks!
http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2011-05-08T19:25:35.html
MOTION: A slob (to start with, Bernie) is authorized to approve
spending tickets filed on the bugtracker up to $200. For amounts
larger than this, we still need a full SLOBs motion.
+1 from me, making this a +7 SLOBs unanimous vote. (Please keep
reporting the under-$200 spends to iaep, please, for transparency!)
MOTION: We will have a Non-binding referendum of the community
regarding whether Sugar Labs should recommend distributing Sugar
modules under the GPLv3 or later (instead of the previous GPLv2 or
later), with individual developers being responsible for deciding
whether to update the license of the modules that they maintain.
+1 from me, making this a +6 SLOBs vote (icarito absent from the room)
+1
MOTION: Patch for our Governance page to bring it in line with what
we're actually doing: http://fpaste.org/JfrD/
+1 from me, making this a +6 SLOBs vote (icarito absent from the room)
Reading the change in http://fpaste.org/JfrD/
<http://fpaste.org/JfrD/>and looking at
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Governance shows two different
things.
The published Governance reads like we are giving the board some power
over governance of Teams, Projects and Local Labs:
"The Oversight Board is responsible for appointing officers with
executive functions. (...)
Existing officers include:
(...)
Team Coordinators
Project Managers
Coordinators of Local Labs <<----"
My comment is that instead, the board should solicit the group the
appointment of a liaison or contact person.
Talking with Walter and Bernie I understand that this was actually the
intention, so the exact wording has changed. Please refer to
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Governance#Officers_and_coordinators
to read the final wording and check.
On a separate note, the word "official", when directly translated to
spanish, has a military connotation so I suggested to call this person a
"delegate" instead.
Under the current version, this gets my +1 with the door open to fix the
wording.
Sebastian
<http://fpaste.org/JfrD/>
--Mel
_______________________________________________
SLOBs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
[email protected]
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
