On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Christoph Derndorfer < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I just saw this article over on O'Reilly Radar and a lot of what the author > says also applies to the Journal: "Why files need to die: Files are an > anachronism in the digital age. It's time for something better." ( > http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/07/why-files-need-to-die.html). > > So while it's still early days I definitely feel that the Journal is > generally moving into the right direction, especially with all the new > features and whatnot discussed during the eduJAM! summit:-) > I am not purely convinced on eliminating the files paradigm, maybe the folders would be a different conversation. But files are well... pretty obiquos. Since you seem very interesting in having this paradigm of a journal. I wonder if you got inspired out of Zeitgeist project in gnome (I think they rename it now to something more normal like gnome-journal or something). I would like to hear your validation of the journal and why is it a good idea, and how deep will this change goes beyond the UI and apps to a commandline environment. > > Cheers, > Christoph > > -- > Christoph Derndorfer > co-editor, olpcnews > url: www.olpcnews.com > e-mail: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* EspaƱol http://es.openoffice.org
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
