On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Pablo Flores <[email protected]> wrote: > Yesterday we discussed with Sridhar Dhanapalan and other OLPC-Australia team > people the impact of updating the Sugar version on their deployment. One of > the unforeseen impacts comes to the documentation they have made for > training their teachers, as it has plenty of screenshots and videos that got > outdated because of all the UI changes made recently. This will bring an > important amount of work for updating... > > One of the things that could be very helpful for them would be having the > floss manuals updated. I took a look at the manuals of "classic" activities > and they weren't updated. It would be great if some of the contributors who > worked on those manuals could lend a hand for having them updated. > > Looking further, I think there should be some way for keeping the activities > documentation updated, or at least having a single place to see for each > activity how much updated its documentation is. Looking for ideas for having > this done. > > Would it make sense including documentation updating in the upstreaming > process somehow?
Perhaps a coincidence? I was corresponding with Adam this morning about the possibility of organizing a sprint to update the Sugar manuals. I was going to put out a call for a champion on the Sugar side to help organize it. Any takers? -walter > > Saludos, > Pablo Flores > > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
