On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Dan Tenason <dan.tena...@mail.ru> wrote:
> There might be a few issues that have a valid place on the Sugar digest. > > 1. Is it intellectually honest to assert that every XO ever made is in > daily use? It is one thing to embellish by calling your beer "the worlds > best." It is another thing to reduce the credibility of such an important > project by exaggeration. > > We already said we don't know how many XOs are broken/stolen/in boxes. We was already clear that we don't have a mechanism to accurately report daily users. Apparently you are the only one obsessed with this issue. > 2. Is the passionate response from Messrs. Anderson, Gonzalo, and Bender > to discussion about inflated Sugar numbers correlated to the limited amount > of academic research on Sugar and OLPC. > Rhetoric question? > 3. Has any progress been made on either the seating of a new Oversight > Board or the deployment data Mr. Bender promised last month. > Sebastian Silva and Caryl Bigenho volunteered to run a new election. They can reply better about that. I am collecting the replies from the deployments, and working in a document. Until now, we received 12 replies, waiting to get more replies. > > And yes, I do all of my initial research under a pseudonym for the the > same reason food critics do. > Are you Vegan? :) Is strange you claim we are acting in a dishonest way, but you are not capable of make questions with your own name. -- Gonzalo Odiard SugarLabs - Software for children learning
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep