walterbender back to the topic for one sec 23:58 I worry that once again the election process is stalled 23:58 can we appoint a SLOB member to work with the committee to make sure things move forward? 23:58 any volunteers? 23:58 CanoeBerry, ??? 23:59 gonzalo walterbender, at least we should ask to the comite by email and openly in the mailimg list for the status 00:00 walterbender, some of the has been very vocal about the lack of a election 00:00 walterbender, some of them has been very vocal about the lack of a election 00:00 walterbender yes 00:00 so perhaps one of our more vocal members should take the lead on this... 00:00 why I recommend CanoeBerry 00:01 CanoeBerry i can talk to Caryl Bigenho and others, yes 00:01 gonzalo CanoeBerry, thanks 00:01 walterbender CanoeBerry, thanks. would be a big help 00:02 sent Caryl two different blog posts for her newsletter and hear nothing back :P 00:02 gonzalo CanoeBerry, you are a good candidate to move this forward, you have contact with the diverse olpc ecosystem 00:02 claudia_ agree 00:02 gonzalo walterbender, i sent her a article too 00:04 by the way, the newsletter was a good idea, i think 00:05 walterbender well, we have a plan :) 00:05 moving on... The meeting log seems to support the speculation that the election process has stalled.
Two and a half months passed without movement. When appointed the task, Mr. Holt gave a response the he would talk to ' Caryl Bigenho and others.' Since then, two more weeks have passed without public signs of progress from either Ms. Bigenhho or Mr. Holt. Dan >Thursday, September 24, 2015 6:00 AM -04:00 from Walter Bender ><walter.ben...@gmail.com>: > >On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Dan Tenason < dan.tena...@mail.ru > wrote: >> Is anything happening on the election front? >> >> The last public comment was the first week of July. It seemed there was much >> stuff to do. So much stuff that the earliest possible date to hold an >> election would be in November, 4 month later. Here we are 2.5 months later >> and not a single public indicator of progress. > >The last public discussion was at the September SLOB meeting >( http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2015-09-14 ). > >> >> A cynical person might think that there is the same amount of substance >> behind the oversight board as there is behind the statement that three >> million students use Sugar activities daily. > >A person who attended the meeting or read the minutes rather than make >groundless speculations might think that the oversight board is >concerned that the election committee is failing to meet its deadlines >and consequently appointed a liaison to expedite the process. A person >who attended the meeting or read the minutes would also note that >progress in being made on the new website and feedback has been >requested. > >regards. > >-walter > >> >> -- >> Dan Tenason >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > > > >-- >Walter Bender >Sugar Labs >http://www.sugarlabs.org
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep