Hi On 11 April 2016 at 23:30, Sam P. <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hosting a static site is a non-issue. We can easily do it on SL servers. > We can even configure it to automatically rebuild on git update. > > I would not use github pages. It does not yet support TLS, which is very > important in this day and age. > > Don't let Jekyll limit you either. I have not compared it to other > solutions, especially not when making a wiki. We can run anything on our > servers. > Wow, okay cool! If we have among us the labor power to set up git hooks so that changes made on a ssg source repo on github are reliably rebuilt quickly, that would be ideal, I think. However, if it would be a burden or unmaintained, then using a 3rd party host that costs $0 and has those core features and is maintained would be better, I think. I'm not really qualified to make the call on which ssg is best for us. I took a quick look and of the 2, I think I prefer tesla to lektor. As long as the one chosen accepts markdown and something simply like liquid or jinja2 for templates, I'm happy :) Re: TLS, since it is a common problem, someone already fixed it, https://github.com/isaacs/github/issues/156#issuecomment-193166403 > Could this project also merge the developer site back into the > static-wiki? Right now it feels very oddly separated. > +1 Who will set this up on the SL servers, and when? :) -- Cheers Dave
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
