Didn't we all rebutt this proposal previously? Do I need to state my
objections again?
Basically; look at who doesn't requre membership donations:
GNOME, Fedora, etc - Projects were most members contribute
Who even does membership donations? I think somebody said the GNU
Foundation, but it's a *Foundation*, and people probably just want to
donate to RMS. There are great people in the SL community, but I
wouldn't say we have a person with an reputation like RMS.
Thanks,
Sam
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 16.05.2016, at 02:06, Dave Crossland <[email protected]> wrote:
I suggest develop a 'super list' with as many possible members as
possible, and then make persistent attempts to contact them until
they pay a membership donation, ask for a membership bursary so they
don't have to pay the fee personally, or tell us to go away :)
Where can I read more about the proposal to let only paying members
vote? (I’m excited about the current energy in the community but
can’t follow everything closely due to volume of emails)
- Bert -
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
[email protected]
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
[email protected]
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
