AFIK, it is true. Do you have any reference to show that the Sugar Labs
Board has any different bylaws? I am new to the Board
and so at some historical point, the normal rules of order could have
The motion was not made by Sebastian, but by Walter. I think you need to
re-read the log of the meeting. Non-members of the Board are welcome to
propose actions by the Board, but Board members must take the action, if
they so chose.
The vote by 'private thread' is not a Benghazi conspiracy theory. There
is no one on the Board who is conspriing to keep secrets from the
I really think your persistence in accusing the Board of conspiracy is
out of line.
On 06/30/2016 06:33 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 30 June 2016 at 12:07, Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net> wrote:
I posted no motion on June 4.
Making a comment is not a motion.
My apologies; you drafted it and I posted it in thread "Motion: to
undertake a fund raising drive." and it was not seconded.
According to standard rules of order, a motion must be 'moved' by
a member of the Board.
As far as I know, this is false.
Here is a copy of my earlier email which you did not respond to in your reply:
--- 8< ---
Walter notes that
(a) the GPL motion - **which you voted to approve** - was submitted
(i) by email, and
(ii) by Sebastian, not a SLOB member, and
(b) it was voted on in a private thread on the SLOBs list, which
Walter regretfully informs us he forgot to CC to the lists.
--- 8< ---
I would like you to comment on these 4 points :)
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)