On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net> wrote:
Hi, Dave

This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion.

At today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting [1], we discussed the motion submitted by Sebastian Silva to finalize the transition from GPLv2 to GPLv3 for the Sugar core libraries (Sugar Activity developers are still free to choose whatever Libre license they prefer for their work.) See [2]. I second the motion and bring it to you in an email vote.

Didn't the motion pass? I already merged the change of licence into the sugar repo, as per the approval.

Also, will we migrate sugar-toolkit-gtk3 to LGPLv3+? What about sugar-datastore?



Approve.

Tony Anderson

Approve.

Sameer

Approve.


BTW I'm worried about the fact that the Sugar-Web part (and so Sugarizer too) use the Apache 2.0 Licence.
I'm not a specialist but what imply a Licence migration ?

These web people and their non copyleft liscenses. I'm defiantly not a copyright holder for sugar-web, but aren't they worried about people stealing their work and rolling it into nonfree software?

Thanks,
Sam


          Lionel.

+1 para GPLv3 motion


___________________
Lic. José Miguel García
Montevideo - Uruguay

Approved!

Claudia

Today at 8:04PM (ET) would be the deadline for the GPLv3 motion. (May 13 @ 8:04PM ET)

So this vote was 6 in favor and one abstention.

Tony

_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Reply via email to