On 14 July 2016 at 07:13, Sam Parkinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> What do you mean? ASLO is based on very old technology, which is going to > get broken. > > 10/10 would love to improve ASLO. I actually did an "ASLO2" effort a > while ago, although that failed for reasons that are documented on my > blog. I would be up for using a AppStream and PackageKit based stack to > reinvent the activity store experience though. > I think if ASLO can't be resuscitated, something VERY simple - a set of XO files and a Jekyll-like simple HTML site that links to them - would best replace it. > Re Sugar using python2; a port to python3 was previously investigated as > part of last years GSoC. We can port it baring our telepathy-python > dependency. (FYI there has not been a commit for telepathy salut or gabble > in the past 2 years. Dead upstream? Still, there are so many bugs that > affect sugar. 10/10 would love to port collab to using something like > Matrix.Org - the spec is *way* is more easy to understand than telepathy. > Telepathy seems much more complex than Sugar needs - we don't need abstract > multi-backend support. > I think we should not upgrade to python3 but javascript.
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
