Can you please trim and summarise. That email was almost impossible to read.
> This discussion started with Tony's reference to PIXEL, a live CD of the > Raspberry Pi OS. That led to a reference to Sugar on a Stick and a > discussion of its ease of installation. From there the discussion got split > as I addressed some technical issues on the SoaS mailing list, followed by > Caryl giving some insights on the suitability of SoaS in comparison to > Sugarizer. Peter responded with more information on the breadth of > technology currently served by SoaS, the Fedora-Sugar Labs spin of Sugar. > > So I've brought both threads together here by cross posting a transcript. That's not a transcript, it's a mess of hard to follow threads all pasted together. > Praise be, Sugarizer has made great steps toward Sugar Labs' technical goals > and deserves much greater investment as Caryl suggests. > > Yet there remains considerable value in the SoaS variants of Sugar, so > attention is still deserved there to support the needs of another class of > users and learners. > > To that end, I notice that the Fedora 26 proposal submission deadline is > fast approaching (21 Feb 2017) and so offer this thread and this feature > page for proposals. If there's going to be people putting in feature change requests they need to be the people doing them. The feature process isn't a means of requesting changes but rather an outline of the work someone is actually doing. > Thanks be given for your insights and efforts! _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
