Hi Caryl, Very nice. I'm fully encourage your proposal. Sugarizer is not my tool, or the tool of OLPC France. Everyone should be able to appropriate Sugarizer itself and transform/adapt it for its needs. That's the way Open Source Software works and Sugarizer definitively lack of tester feedbacks. So welcome Sugarizer 1° ! I will support it technically as far as I could.
Regards. Lionel. 2017-03-02 23:11 GMT+01:00 Caryl Bigenho <cbige...@hotmail.com>: > Hi All... > > > This proposal can be improved a lot. However, I am re-submitting it > mainly as an example of the kinds of things I feel SugarLabs should be > supporting with their precious funds. I originally submitted it last > summer. > > > Because of the SoCalifLinuxExpo and a house full of people, I don't have > the opportunity to make revisions at this moment. Things I can see it needs > are a definite timeline, a clearly thought out budget, and names of some of > the people who would be involved. I would love to have additional > suggestions for things to add and volunteers to assist in getting it into > better shape by the next SLOB meeting. > > > At this point, I do not expect approval, but rather encouragement to > expand and refine this early proposal, along with suggestions in time for > the next SLOB meeting. > > > I invite others (Samson???) to also submit rough drafts of proposals as > samples of the kinds of things SugarLabs could be doing. > > > The SLOB meeting tomorrow is at 11 AM PST. The Expo Hall at SCaLE15X > opens at 10 AM. Because of that it will be difficult for me, Adam, and > other SL members to give our full attention to the meeting. We will do the > best we can under the circumstances. > > > Caryl > >
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep