In the interest of openness and clarity, I am forwarding this conversation to the rest of the SugarLabs Oversight Board and some of the previous board members. I do not feel that this is something that should be hidden from them.
Caryl ________________________________ From: Laura Vargas <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 12:27:29 PM To: Caryl Bigenho Cc: James Cameron; Walter Bender; Gonzalo Odiard; iaep; Samuel Cantero; Karen Sandler; Tony Sebro Subject: Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs Member's List June 2017: 140 verified members 2017-08-29 14:06 GMT-05:00 Caryl Bigenho <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: And, exactly why were there only 3 candidates for 3 slots? Because the committee did not actively recruit other candidates to give us a real election! The year before we worked very hard to get a larger number of candidates than there were offices (all 7 slots were open). We did this by mass emailings and by individually contacting people and encouraging them to run. We ended up with 10 or 11 candidates. As I said before, last year's election was a sham. Caryl We are all volunteers here! Ignacio, Samson and I were properly appointed and the process was approved and over sighted by the board<http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-01-06T19:07:40>. Dave Crossland kindly acted as an impartial party as well. I'm copying Conservancy's Staff as your accusations are beyond a "learning experience" and I feel harassed by you. -- Laura V. I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.” ~ L. Victoria Happy Learning! #LearningByDoing #Projects4good #IDesignATSugarLabs #WeCanDoBetter
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
