+1 from me as well. However, Laura has managed to bypass the issue she agreed to address at the last SLOB meeting: draft a process (I'd prefer guidelines) by which we make these decisions. I for one would like some clarity as to the role of the oversight board in the administration of the program.
regards. -walter On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Lionel Laské <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Lionel > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:13 AM +0200, "Samson Goddy" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> On Sep 14, 2017 3:37 AM, "Laura Vargas" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello SLOBs, >> >> Walter has mentioned we as SLOB's should decide whether or not Sugar Labs >> will participate in GCI 2017. >> >> I was a Code In mentor back in 2013 and I remember it was a nice >> experience with a lot of work but rewarded to see Ignacio winning :D >> >> So, I think we should keep supporting this program. >> >> Motion: Sugar Labs to participate on GCI 2017. >> >> Any second? >> >> I Second the motion, it is important we participate. >> >> >> >> -- >> Laura V. >> * I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org* >> >> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.” >> ~ L. Victoria >> >> Happy Learning! >> #LearningByDoing >> #Projects4good >> #IDesignATSugarLabs >> #WeCanDoBetter >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
