Syukurlah, ternyata sudah ada yang bisa prediksi dengan sangat tepat.
Semoga akan berkurang korban-korban gempa berikutnya.

Sungguh tragis. Telah ada yang memperkirakan korban gempa Aceh, lebih
dari 27 ribu orang. Jumlah ini melebihi total jumlah gempa di Indonesia
selama 100 tahun terkhir, 20.000 orang, catatan USGS. Semoga ada usaha
kuat untuk menurunkan, atau malah meniadakan korban-korban (gempa)
berikutnya. Rata-rata 10 gempa besar per tahun di bumi pada  seratus
tahun kedepan. Sejumlah 3.5 % dari total gempa seratus tahun terakhir
ada di Indonesia. Atau prediksi akan 35 gempa besar di Indonesia next
100 th. Jumlah presentasi ini mungkin sama besar dengan perbandingan
panjang sirkum Pasifik-Medeteran yang ada di Indonesia terhadap panjang
keseluruhannya.

Tanggal berapa saja gempa-gempa Alor, Nabire? Dan jam berapa? 
Apakah ada di bulan purnama, atau bulan mati, seperti prediksi John T.
Norberg? Apakah terjadi pada pagi pergantian malam ke siang (pagi antara
5:00-8:00) ? 

MYT.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 4:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [iagi-net-l] gempa


Kalau melihat artikel dibawah ini sebenarnya gempa di Aceh tsb sudah ada
yang memprediksi. Mungkin ada yang bisa menjelaskan..., mengapa hal ini
luput dari pihak2 yang berhubungan dengan masalah gempa ini.

Wassalam,
yd..
----------
http://newstodaynet.com/27DEC/SS6.HTM

Some knew it was coming 

E SARAVANAN

Chennai, Dec 27: 
  
N Venkatanath, research scholar, and N Rajeshwara Rao, research
supervisor,  
Department of Applied Geology, University of Madras. 

 
        The memories and the trauma caused by the tidal wave that washed
out parts of coastal Chennai and other parts of the State yesterday will
haunt the minds of the people for a long time to come. 

        It is a tough task to forget the damage left behind by the wave
that was triggered by an earthquake in far off Indonesia. The Richter
scale recorded the quake to be in the magnitude of 9.0. 

        What is so mysterious about the earthquake and the subsequent
tidal wave? Cannot it be predicted earlier and the people be warned of
it? Could necessary precautions be taken to minimise the loss to life
and property? In fact, the quake was actually predicted by a team of
research scholars of the Department of Applied Geology, University of
Madras, with a permissible error, a week ago. 

        N Venkatanathan, research scholar, who is currently undergoing a
Ph.D programme in Predicting Earthquake and Aseismic Construction
Designing and the man behind the team working on predictions, said he
had already presented a report about the Indonesian earthquake on 22
December to members of the Department of Science and Technology, New
Delhi. 

        The 15-member team headed by S K Tandan were in Chennai at that
time for a meeting. 

        Venkatanathan, said, 'we predicted that the disaster will occur
on 26 December 2004 at 00:30 (GMT) with 3.54 N latitude and 97.17E
longitude, which is located near the coast of Banyak Island, Sumatra,
Indonesia, with a magnitude at around 6 to 7. The actual calamity
occurred on 26 December 2004 at 00:58 (GMT), with 3.298 N latitude and
95.779 E longitude, located off the west coast of northern Sumatra'. 

        The difference in distance between the predicted place and the
epicentre was 157.11899 km with a time difference of 28 minutes. He also
said the team had predicted that the after-shocks would occur at 700 km
to the South of the epicentre between 5 pm and 6 pm. This was recorded
with permissible error. It occurred at 157 km from the epicentre. That
is with the error of 521 km. 

        Venkatanathan and his guide N Rajeshwara Rao, research
supervisor as he calls him, admit that 'we didn't expect the extent of
damage it will cause to the Tamilnadu coast, since we expected the
magnitude might be around 7.0, which cannot damage Tamilnadu. We never
expected the consequent tidal waves that would have such a devasting
effect on the coastal areas of Tamilnadu, admitted Rajeshwara Rao. 

        Venkatanathan explained that the prediction was based on a novel
method developed by the team. According to the method, when two or more
planets, Sun and the Moon get aligned more or less in line (0 to 180
degree) with the earth it could affect the angular momentum of the earth
and decrease the speed of rotation of the earth which could trigger an
earthquake. 

        But in order to trigger an earthquake in one particular place,
two conditions should be taken into consideration, said Venkatanathan.
One is the distance of the planetary configurations and two the
directions of force acting at the possible epicenter. 

        Venkatanathan also clarified that by analysing the earthquakes
that had occurred over the last 100 years, it was inferred that there
was a role of planetary configurations in triggering earthquakes. 

        He added that the team had earlier predicted possibility of
earthquake occurrences at 27 places, among which Assam was one, and
presented a report at the International Conference of 'Hazards 2004'
held at National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad. 

        He said the success of the prediction rate achieved so far was
around 75 to 80 per cent within a time-frame of plus or minus three to
four days. 

        Rajeshwara Rao said, 'we are in the process of refining the
technique so as to achieve a better success rate for which we should
have a network of inputs from various international research
organisations. For this to happen there was a need for large-scale
funding, which could be done through the Government. He said with these
things in mind, the department had already submitted a proposal to the
Tamilnadu government to establish a Centre for Earthquake and Natural
Hazards Studies (CENHAS). 

        The department had also submitted proposals for collaborative
programmes with Bulgaria and Uzbekistan through the Department of
Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi. 

 

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1041227/asp/nation/story_4179143.asp

Scientist words ring true 
 
OUR SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT 
 
Chennai, Dec. 26: As India mourned, a group of people at Madras
University's Applied Geology department could barely hide their glee. 

December 26, Sumatra, 03.54 degrees latitude and 097.17 degrees
longitude - a team of seismologists led by Dr N. Rajeshwara Rao and N.
Venkatanathan had predicted. The forecast was near perfect. 

Flaunting the relevant information downloaded from the site of the World
Data Center for Seismology, Denver, Venkatanathan said the data put out
by the US Geological Survey read: "December 26, 2004, off the West Coast
of Northern Sumatra, 03.298 degrees latitude and 095.779 degrees
longitude." 

"We had predicted the earthquake in Sumatra as occurring at 6 am this
morning, but it happened there at 6.29 am. And there was a 150 km
difference in the distance from where we had predicted," added
Venkatanathan, whose recent prediction about an earthquake had kept most
of Jorhat, Assam, on the roads early this month. 

He said their earthquake prediction model could be fine-tuned if there
was more actual data on the physical characteristics of an area from
remote sensing satellite maps.

They went wide off the mark when it came to the magnitude of the quake.
They didn't expect the Sumatra tremors to be stronger that 7 on the
Richter scale, but they were recorded at 8.9. Therefore, the tremors
were felt as far as Chennai, some 1,700 km away, "disturbing the total
tectonic setting", said Venkatanathan. 

The researcher and his colleagues use a predictive model, based on the
position and alignment of various planets with the earth. Four heavenly
bodies - Mercury, Venus, Sun and Moon - had aligned with the Earth
today, he said. 

As the researchers rejoiced, some are speaking of celestial retribution.
One contention going around is that the Gods are angry that the Kanchi
seer has been jailed. 
 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To
subscribe, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit IAGI
Website: http://iagi.or.id IAGI-net Archive 1:
http://www.mail-archive.com/iagi-net%40iagi.or.id/
IAGI-net Archive 2: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iagi
Komisi Sedimentologi (FOSI) : F. Hasan
Sidi([EMAIL PROTECTED])-http://fosi.iagi.or.id
Komisi SDM/Pendidikan : Edy Sunardi([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Komisi Karst :
Hanang Samodra([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Komisi Sertifikasi : M.
Suryowibowo([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Komisi OTODA : Ridwan
Djamaluddin([EMAIL PROTECTED] atau [EMAIL PROTECTED]), Arif Zardi
Dahlius([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Komisi Database Geologi : Aria A.
Mulhadiono([EMAIL PROTECTED])
---------------------------------------------------------------------




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit IAGI Website: http://iagi.or.id
IAGI-net Archive 1: http://www.mail-archive.com/iagi-net%40iagi.or.id/
IAGI-net Archive 2: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iagi
Komisi Sedimentologi (FOSI) : F. Hasan Sidi([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])-http://fosi.iagi.or.id
Komisi SDM/Pendidikan : Edy Sunardi([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Komisi Karst : Hanang Samodra([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Komisi Sertifikasi : M. Suryowibowo([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Komisi OTODA : Ridwan Djamaluddin([EMAIL PROTECTED] atau [EMAIL PROTECTED]), 
Arif Zardi Dahlius([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Komisi Database Geologi : Aria A. Mulhadiono([EMAIL PROTECTED])
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Kirim email ke