Gak sengaja ketemu artikel dari John Gibson
  Aslinya ada di 
http://www.paradigmgeo.com/objects/pdf/0408AOGR50AnniversaryIssue.pdf
   
  Pak John ini mantan bos gede saya waktu di Landmark dulu. Sekarang jadi 
mudhir kabir nya Paradigm. Orangnya memang sangat visionaris sekali.
   
  Menarik salah satu hal contoh yang dikemukakan, dimana satu company 
mengesampingkan masalah konfidentiality data dan segala turunannya dalam usaha 
membuka peluang-peluang (baca prospek) baru.
   
  Nah apakah mungkin  kalau kata 'kumpeni' kita ganti dengan 'Republik 
Indonesia' atau 'BPMIGAS' ? .......kaya'nya sih masih mimpi.......
   
  Salam tengah minggu.
   
  Oki
  ----------
  Innovations Introduce
  New Ways To Solve
  Complex Problems
  By John W. Gibson
  HOUSTON–Imagine for a moment that you are the chief executive officer of a 
struggling
  independent company with a declining 55,000-acre asset. The company is in 
serious debt,
  production costs are higher than average, and the business could fold if more 
reserves
  cannot be found on property the company already owns. After investing a chunk 
of money
  to gather new data–which identifies very promising potential–staff 
geoscientists spend
  years trying to nail the exact location and value of those reserves, without 
success. Now
  desperate, what do you do?
  You take some time off to think, and find yourself at a technology conference 
for corporate
  executives. Someone is talking about Linus Torvalds, the Linux® operating 
system and
  the global open-source software community. You suddenly are struck with an 
outrageous
  idea and rush home. You call together your company’s top scientists and tell 
them to
  gather all the geological data on the property and post it on the Internet to 
ask the world
  where to find those new reserves. Your staff, of course, thinks you are out 
of your mind. In
  this industry, nothing is more guarded than proprietary data. But you cannot 
afford to
  think in conventional terms; you are trying to save the company.
  So you put up $575,000 in prize money, post every scrap of data you own on 
your Web
  site, and invite anyone interested to solve your exploration challenge.Within 
weeks, a
  virtual workforce of more than 1,400 geologists, engineers and scientists 
from 50 countries
  are submitting shockingly creative ideas. But that is not all. Graduate 
students, college
  professors, consultants, mathematicians and even retired military personnel 
are vying
  for the prize. All told, you receive 110 prospects, 50 percent of which your 
own staff never
  identified.
  The winning entry comes from a consulting partnership on the other side of 
the world:
  Australia. The winners have never seen your asset, never even set foot in 
North America.
  More than 80 percent of the targets yield substantial reserves. In fact, you 
dramatically
  exceed your original production goals. Your company skyrockets from $100 
million to more
  than $20 billion in market cap, and you become one of the wealthiest 
executives in the nation.
  A fairy tale? Not at all. It actually happened a couple
  years ago. But not in the oil and gas industry. The industry
  was mining, and the reserves were gold. The idea was
  conceived by Goldcorp CEO Rob McEwen, a former investment
  banker who was not hamstrung by conventional
  wisdoms. Because of McEwen’s bold initiative,
  Goldcorp’s 50-year-old mine at Red Lake, Ontario,
  coughed up 8 million ounces of new gold worth more than
  $3 billion–all for a $500,000 investment. Unbelievable!
  This true story offers a glimpse of the future of oil and
  gas in America. By 2020, I am convinced that we will no
  longer find a story like this
  hard to believe at all. The industry
  will be making money
  producing affordable energy
  in environmentally
  sustainable ways, through
  remarkable networks of intelligent
  and highly motivated
  individuals who live
  and work far beyond the traditional
  boundaries of our
  present corporations. And
  U.S. independents could be
  the first to adopt new models
  of collaboration, which I
  call “people fusion.”
  Fusing More Than Data
  People fusion is related to the more familiar concept
  of data fusion, which originally came out of the military.
  The purpose of data fusion is to combine data from
  many different sources and sensors to generate new
  forms of information and improve the overall performance
  of a particular system–for example, the remote
  identification of targets.
  In military parlance, there are three levels of fusion.
  The lowest level, data fusion, combines multiple sources
  of data to produce new raw data ready for interpretation.
  The second level, feature level fusion, begins to
  extract specific details such as edges, corners, lines and
  geometrical patterns from the new raw data, and attempts
  to relate those shapes to known objects. The
  highest level, known as decision fusion, requires the
  use of artificial intelligence to return a “confidence
  score” on the identification of a particular object or set
  of objects.
  This is not much different from the oil and gas industry.
  We are fusing data from multiple sources, often
  in three-dimensional models, and applying advanced
  technologies to extract and identify edges and geometrical
  objects. And we are at least beginning to apply expert
  algorithms and simple forms of artificial intelligence
  to give confidence scores–or “uncertainty
  analyses”–to objects extracted from the data.
  The challenge of data fusion lies in integrating information
  from traditionally isolated domains. For example,
  even before the creation of the U.S. Department of
  Homeland Security, various government agencies began
  trying to integrate information across the boundaries of
  jurisdictions–city-to-city,
  county-to-county, state-tostate,
  etc. Numerous advancements
  in data fusion
  now enable the government
  to track individuals, cell
  phones, cars and even bank
  accounts and spending patterns
  in ways no one could
  imagine only a decade ago.
  In the business world,
  multinational corporations
  are struggling with other
  fusion challenges. The acquisitions
  and mergers of
  separate brands, each of
  which originally operated a geographically-demarcated
  fiefdom, cost multinational companies billions of dollars
  a year in duplication of effort.With offices, manufacturing
  plants and other facilities scattered across
  continents, data fusion and even “process fusion” are essential.
  But the single toughest challenge is people fusion,
  creating a seamless global network of human beings
  all working toward a common goal.
  The problem is strict hierarchical organizations such
  as the management structures typical of oil and gas
  companies–also derived from the military in an era prior
  to modern information technology–are proving incapable
  of fusing people effectively enough to innovate
  and compete in an age of global interconnectivity.
  Technology, complexity, sensor proliferation, changing
  demographics and the global economy are driving
  new models of human connection and interaction. In contrast
  with command-and-control organizations, virtual
  online communities based on self-organization and collaboration
  are appearing everywhere. They are fusing
  people in new ways, creating new relationships and new
  opportunities. People want to join these online commu-
  “I believe the time has come for this industry to
  test the collaborative power of people fusion.To that
  end, my company plans to post on InnoCentive a
  critical research and development problem related
  to automating interpretation, along with a complete
  data set.Who knows who may take up the challenge?”
  The Future
  nities. Consider MySpace.com. In August 2006, MySpace
  had 100 million registered users. One year later, it had
  doubled in size to 200 million users.
  New Forms Of Information
  Collaborative, self-organizing communities are also
  creating new forms of information.Wikipedia is a prime
  example. It is the fastest growing repository of information
  in the world, adding approximately 2,000 new articles
  every day. Like the open-source community that
  created Linux, the Wikipedia community has literally
  tens of thousands of global contributors. None of them
  are paid to research or write for the online encyclopedia.
  They do it out of passion for the subject, whatever
  that subject may be.Wikipedia employs only five people,
  whose jobs are simply to monitor and referee the
  creative chaos of the collaborative community.
  In a test of Wikipedia’s ability to find and correct
  facts, obscenities were randomly inserted into numerous
  articles.Without notification of any kind, the owners
  of those articles typically removed the offending
  material in less than two minutes. Astonishing! How
  can encyclopedias compete with that?
  People fusion is already changing the world. It turns
  out that a self-organizing network of human beings
  with a passion for what they are doing (even if it is not
  their “job”) can often create far more value than employees
  on the payroll. Smart companies like Goldcorp
  are learning to harness information technology, the Web
  and new collaborative models to solve some of their
  toughest technical problems.
  One way they are doing so is through virtual online exchanges
  fueled by both passion and monetary incentives.
  InnoCentive.com, launched as an independent e-business
  in 2001 by U.S. pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly, is a good
  example. InnoCentive matches unsolved research problems
  with the brainpower of more than 140,000 registered
  problem solvers from 175 countries, who compete for cash
  rewards. Companies such as Boeing, Dow, DuPont and
  Proctor & Gamble use InnoCentive to expand their workforces
  without hiring more employees.
  Anyone who registers with InnoCentive and signs
  the proper nondisclosure agreements can log on, gain
  access to all the relevant data, and work on a problem.
  If one’s solution is chosen by the client, he wins a reward
  ranging between $5,000 and $1 million.And these
  are extremely complex problems in fields such as business,
  engineering, chemistry, physics and physical science.
  Interestingly, people who find themselves attracted
  to challenges posted on virtual scientific exchanges include
  retired experts in the field. These are people with
  decades of experience who still love using their minds,
  but simply no longer want to work full time. So they
  self-select a particular challenge where they have both
  expertise and interest. In many cases, they are motivated
  more by meaning than by money.
  Enormous Benefits
  The oil and gas industry could benefit enormously
  from the growing momentum of global online people
  fusion. After all, the industry is suffering from a people
  shortage. As the workforce ages and the big crew
  change continues, many of the most seasoned veterans
  are retiring. As an industry, we need to retain their
  knowledge as long as possible without constraining
  them as employees.
  How? By taking advantage of these new models of collaboration.
  The most serious oil field challenges–those
  technical problems that have a direct impact on the bottom
  line–could be posted online to allow people with passion
  and expertise to self-select what they would like to
  work on. In most cases, I suspect they would produce
  better solutions than people merely “assigned” to the
  task.
  Even the smallest independent could have access to
  a network of hundreds, maybe even thousands, of technical
  experts the company could never dream of hiring.
  Goldcorp had a few dozen geologists on the payroll.
  After posting its challenge on the Internet, with a cash
  incentive, it had more than 1,000 people panning for
  gold. Like Wikipedia, all it really would take is a handful
  of highly focused employees to monitor, evaluate
  and identify the best solutions to the problem at hand.
  What sort of oil and gas problems would be appropriate?
  Almost anything. But practically speaking, the
  greatest initial value of the new collaborative models
  will come from locating untapped reserves and increasing
  production on properties that companies already
  lease and operate. Since some 90 percent of the money
  spent on exploration and production today is directed
  toward production and 50 percent of exploration is in
  mature fields, why not go for the low-hanging fruit?
  Goldcorp succeeded because it already owned the property
  and a comprehensive set of data.
  Imagine the case of a small independent with an underperforming
  field in West Texas, where the water cuts
  are really high. Given all the data it owns on this field,
  The Future
  the company would like to know how to shrink water
  production by, say, 15 percent because that would increase
  profits by X amount. The independent could try
  to solve the problem with its own, rather miniscule staff,
  or it could post it online with an attractive cash reward
  and tap the collective genius of the industry at large.
  Outside The Box
  The beauty of the new collaborative model is that the
  company may just attract a retired expert in that particular
  West Texas formation who happens to have a
  few hours a day to tinker with the problem–after working
  on a novel, or playing with the grandkids. It may
  also get the interest of experts of a different sort, people
  who do not know a thing about geology and are not
  biased by conventional wisdom, but who think so far
  outside the box they may come up with a solution no
  one in the industry ever would have dreamed of.
  Remember, Rob McEwen
  was not a miner.
  Cross-pollination from
  other, seemingly unrelated
  fields could reap surprising
  rewards. For example, could
  brain imaging technology
  meant to identify the subtle
  transitions between tumors
  and healthy tissue help image
  the boundaries of subtle
  oil or gas accumulations?
  Could robotic systems used
  to guide delicate surgical operations
  help solve directional
  drilling challenges?
  Goldcorp had mathematicians, military officers and
  college professors working on its gold mining problem.
  What value would there be in attracting people outside
  of oil and gas to collaborate on solving the industry’s
  most urgent problems? We could post the U.S. industry’s
  “top 10” technical/political/environmental challenges,
  and put up substantial monetary incentives to
  spark the imaginations of thousands of ordinary people
  who may already have a stake in the outcome. Imagine,
  for example, inviting the collective genius of the
  American public to help us lower the cost of gasoline at
  the pump, or drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife
  Refuge without doing damage.
  Other industries are way ahead of oil and gas. There
  are only seven petroleum-related problems posted on
  InnoCentive. Two have to do with cleaning up and removing
  oil from sediments and water bodies without causing
  harm to wildlife or the environment. None are related to
  oil and gas exploration, development or production, or analyzing
  and interpreting of oil field data.
  I believe the time has come for this industry to test
  the collaborative power of people fusion. To that end,
  my company plans to post on InnoCentive a critical research
  and development problem related to automating
  interpretation, along with a complete data set (to
  which we own the rights).We are offering an incentive
  of at least six digits for substantially better solutions.
  Who knows who may take up the challenge?
  Quantifying Problems
  One major barrier to adopting innovative models of
  global online collaboration is that, as an industry, we are
  still not very good at identifying and describing specific
  problems that have, or could
  have, real impacts on the
  bottom line.To do that, companies
  need to know which
  problems matter, and be
  able to articulate them with
  sufficient clarity that someone
  other than their employees
  or colleagues can
  understand what it is they
  are trying to accomplish.We
  all have corporate objectives,
  but they are not measurable.
  We also have strategies
  and tactics. Ultimately,
  we need to get down to quantifiable problems.
  For example, increasing production by 3.0 percent
  in this field would be worth X amount of dollars. That
  is a problem that could be posted on InnoCentive, because
  we have the data, we know precisely what we
  need to measure, and we know what the value is.We
  also know how much prize money the solution would
  be worth. For someone to win the cash award, of course,
  they would have to carefully document the method and
  the predicted outcome.
  To leverage the collective genius of the world, oil and
  gas companies would actually improve the corporate genius
  within their own walls by clearly defining what it
  is that creates real value. Many organizations never quite
  articulate how a particular employee’s job adds value to
  the bottom line. Some jobs do not.We could transform
  “‘Affordable’ means more than the cost of gasoline
  to the consumer. It includes the cost of hydrocarbon
  extraction to the environment and to all the people
  who come after us–our children, grandchildren and
  great-grandchildren.”
  The Future
  the way we do business simply by posting–even internally–
  the top five or 10 problems we need to solve in order
  to compete and thrive. What would happen if a company’s
  own employees were free to self-select the corporate
  challenges they were most passionate about, and self-organize
  around finding solutions? If they could solve those
  well-defined problems, would it really matter what their
  job descriptions were?
  The biggest challenge in collaborative models of people
  fusion, of course, will be in changing the entrenched
  mind-sets and cultures of our hierarchical organizations
  to accommodate this radically new way of solving problems.
  That is why I believe U.S. independents are likely
  to lead the way. Because of their size, they are much more
  flexible than larger upstream organizations. Many small
  operators already know how to leverage outside consultants,
  evaluate business opportunities quickly, and take
  appropriate action. Extending that model to accommodate
  a global network of problem-solvers would not necessarily
  be a huge change.
  Turning Data Loose
  Another barrier to this way of working is the whole
  concept of “proprietary” data. Goldcorp hung out its dirty
  laundry for all to see. The mining industry–one of the
  world’s oldest, most conservative and secretive industries–
  was literally stunned. No one had ever done such
  a thing, yet it proved to be the key that unlocked almost
  unimaginable wealth. After all, it was not merely owning
  the data or even processing, imaging or analyzing
  the data that finally put money in the bank for Goldcorp.
  It was turning that data loose to huge numbers of people
  who had no “right” to see it, people with radically different
  ideas, methods, tools and technologies.
  By the way, the breakthrough for Goldcorp came from a
  clever group of entrepreneurs on the other side of the planet
  that had developed a new approach to 3-D imaging.
  There is really no danger in exposing proprietary
  data, as long as we choose carefully what to share and
  make sure we actually own the data. Given all the legal
  safeguards surrounding access and authorization
  on InnoCentive and other online scientific exchanges,
  we are not risking the family jewels by opening our
  data to the collective genius of the world.We are taking
  a bold new step toward our own competitive advantage
  while also ensuring that the world will have access
  to more affordable energy, which is what the oil
  and gas industry is all about.
  Why do I think the upstream energy industry is ripe
  for people fusion? Why does it even matter? Because even
  though I suspect commodity prices will remain high for
  a long time, I do not think that is in the best interest of
  either the industry or the public. As an industry, our purpose
  is not simply to supply energy to the world.We need
  to supply affordable energy to the world.
  Solving our own problems at everyone else’s expense
  is simply unsustainable. Ultimately we need to optimize
  more than just the parts; we need to optimize the
  whole system of energy discovery and delivery. That
  means we cannot afford to solve our complex problems
  in isolation.We need everyone’s help. After all, they are
  in this, too. “Affordable” means more than the cost of
  gasoline to the consumer. It includes the cost of hydrocarbon
  extraction to the environment and to all the people
  who come after us–our children, grandchildren and
  great-grandchildren.
  The younger generation coming into the oil and gas
  industry already thinks and interacts differently than
  the generation that is running most of our corporations.
  They have grown up with the Internet. They are less motivated
  by money alone; they want to do something significant.
  They want to work together collaboratively to
  make the world a better place.
  Information technology and exploding online communities
  are rapidly harmonizing cultures, standards of living
  and quality of life. Affordable energy is critical to the
  future. Isn’t it time the industry began to harness the
  passion and collective intelligence of the world to achieve
  new breakthroughs in global energy efficiency and sustainability?

       

Kirim email ke