Wah itu mungkin hanya dari pajak yang ditarik dari penjualan btbr saja. Powered by Telkomsel BlackBerry®
-----Original Message----- From: <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:40:09 To: <[email protected]> Reply-To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [iagi-net-l] Batubara itu komoditi tambang atau Energi Kompas hari ini ada 2 iklan yang cukup menarik , pertama tentang APBN ( dua halaman penuh )dan kedua tentang UU Migas ( setengah halaman penuh ).Dalam APBN 2012 ternyata penghasilan dari SDA non migas ( termasuk batubara dan mineral ) " Hanya " 18 T, kalau dibandingkan dg pendapatn negara secara keseluruhan ternyata hanya kira kira hanya 1,2% sangat kecil sekali ( jangan jangan ditutupun tidak berpengaruh thd pendapatan negara ) , padahal sektor pertambangan ini khususnya Minerba mengekploitasi besar besaran SDA dg beribu ribu IUP yg diterbitkan diera otda ini,jangan jangan biaya dampak lingkunganya jauh lebih besar dari penghasilannya.Disektor SDA Migas menyumbangkan 198 T atau 13,5 % dari total pendapatan negara , lebih lumayan dari sektor pertambangan (1.2% dibanding 13,5 % ), namun ternyata Biaya Subsidi Migas yg dihabiskan untuk energi ( membakar BBM untuk transportasai dan listrik ( telah melebihi 200 T ( > 270 T untuk 2013), ini sudah melampui dari penghasilannya dari Migas, apalagi liftingnya terus turun ( dari 930 menjadi 900 MBOD ). Iklan yang kedua tetang UU Migas yg membahas khususnya terkait dg kedua lembaga yg ngurusi Migas sebelum dan sesudah adanya UU Migas ( UU No.8/1971 tentang Pertamina ke UU No.22/2001 tentang Migas ), Kenapa kok tiba tiba ada Iklan tsb ? khususnya tentang UU Migas , apa karena dipermasalahkan di MK shg perlu menarik perhatian publik, cuma kok yg dibahas lembaganya , sedangkan "hasil" nya ( perbandingan lifting sebelum dan sesudahnya tidak ditampilkan )dan yg lain lainnya. Judul iklan ini "Negara berdaulat Penuh atas SDA " apa iya Negara sudah bedaulat penuh ? ISM > batubara adalah batu yang siap dibakar atau siap terbakar. > energi adalah kapasitas utk melakukan kerja. > batubara salah satu manfaat utamanya adalah bahan bakar. > > sepertinya / sebetulnya sih batubara & migas dll belum bisa > dikatakan sebagai energi, melainkan sebagai bahan bakar. > sesudah dibakar maka bahan bakar itu menghasilkan panas > untuk membangkitkan energi. > sumber panas bisa dari berbagai macam, a/l panas bumi, > peluruhan inti atom, sinar surya. > lalu kalau soal "kesalahan" uu yang dimaksud kirakira uu > yang mana ya pak ? uu mineral & batubara yg baru memang > mengandung banyak kelemahan. banyak konflik antar > pasal-pasal di dalam uu minerba ini. > > kesalahan lainnya, juga dipengaruhi oleh penafsiran & > penerapan dari uu lainnya. seperti penerapan uu otonomi > daerah yang "kebablasan". > di mana kepala daerah seolah-olah bisa menerbitkan izin > tambang tanpa pertimbangan yg lengkap. > di lain hal , batubara sebetulnya tidak salah sebagai bahan > tambang. utk mengusahakannya akan sarat dengan teknologi > pertambangan yang berbeda dgn teknologi per-migasan. > batubara : kalau pengelolaannya bener dan bertanggungjawab > tidak merugikan negara. a/l berbagai kewajiban merupakan > risiko dan tanggungjawab pemegang izin yg tidak ada 'cost > recovery'-nya seperti di migas. > > > --- On Sat, 8/25/12, Yanto R. Sumantri <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From: Yanto R. Sumantri <[email protected]> > Subject: [iagi-net-l] Batubara itu komoditi tambang atau > Energi > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Saturday, August 25, 2012, 11:32 AM > > > > > > Mungkin kondisi ini tepat untuk membenahi industri batubara > kita. > Menurut saya , "kesalahan utama " UU adalah memasukan bt > bara hanya sebagai komoditi tambang . Seharusnya ini > dimasukan katagori ENERGI sehingga perlakuannya sama dengan > migas. > > > si Abah > > > > > > > From: git sulistiono <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 24, > 2012 5:47 PM > Subject: Re: [iagi-net-l] Pembatalan pengembangan Olympic > Dam - akhir mining boom di Australia? > > > > > > Secara resmi, BHP tidak memasukkan faktor carbon tax sebagai > salah satu alasan pembatalan, mungkin mereka tidak mau > berkonfrontasi langsung dengan pemerintah hehehe (Noel , > sebagai salah satu petinggi BHP, tolong konfirmasi). Alasan > yang disebut adalah turunnya harga komoditi, tingginya > ongkos tenaga kerja dan biaya2 proyek lain, serta nilai > tukar dolar Australia yang dirasa terlalu tinggi. Ini juga > analisis pinggiran, malah gak bisa disebut analisis > > salam > Prianggito > > > > > From: Ewa Rappe <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, 24 August 2012 7:46 PM > Subject: Re: [iagi-net-l] Pembatalan pengembangan Olympic > Dam - akhir mining boom di Australia? > > > > Kalau saya melihatnya karena di Australia > perusahaan-perusahaan tentunya tidak mau keuntungan yang > sudah diproyeksikan menjadi mengecil secara signifikan > gara-gara "carbon tax" yang besarnya $23/ton CO2 dan pajak > ini akan terus bergerak naik hingga 2015. Mungkin hitungan > BHP pajak ini akan mengurangi proyeksi keuntungan yang > sangat signifikan. Kemungkinan kalau partai buruh terjungkal > dan LNP menguasai dunia perpolitikan Australia maka proyek > Olympic Dam akan di hidupkan lagi. Untuk dunia tambang di > Indonesia..... kemungkinan besar karena aturan perpajakan > dan royalti yang tumpang tindih kali ya yang membuat dunia > pertambangan seperti jalan ditempat serta sedikit mundur.... > Kondisi keuangan negara-negara didunia yang juga melemah > juga patut diperhtungkan sebagai salah satu sebab mining > boom melemah. Keuangan Eropa yang merosot tajam gara-gara > "nomboki" utang Yunani disamping Spanyol, Italia, Inggris > serta negara Eropa lainnya yang sudah mulai keberatan hutang > membuat mereka mengurangi laju pembangunannya. Amerika > sendiri belum terbebas dari keterpurukannya, makanya China > juga terpaksa tidak bisa mengekspor "hasil karyanya" > sebanyak tahun-tahun sebelumnya. > > > Benar tidaknya pemikiran saya ini saya juga tidak tahu, > maklum analis kacangan heheheee... > > > Salam, > Ewa > > > On 24 August 2012 13:02, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sebelum heboh ini, industri tambang batubara kita sudah > surut. Turunnya harga jual hingga 30% dibanding nilai puncak > diawal 2010 yg dipicu beberapa hal, termasuk permintaan > batubara Indonesia dari China dan India yg melemah > setidaknya selama 6 bulan terakhir, telah memicu > penundaan/pengurangan kegiatan ekspansi utk kehati-hatian. > Hanya Low rank coal yg dekat port saja yg masih profit utk > diproduksi, itu pun tidak dalam jumlah besar. > > Saya dengar beberapa perusahaan kecil-menengah bahkan > menghentikan aktivitas eksplorasi, geologist dilepas dst. > > Kondisi di atas diperparah oleh hambatan terkait issue lokal > (koordinasi/perijinan di pemerintah daerah, sosial, > sulit/dead-locknya pembebasan tanah/lahan karena dikuasai > mafia dst). > > Proyek power plant yang digembar-gemborkan pemerintah SBY > masih jauh panggang dari asap, belum mampu menyerap produksi > batubara kita. > > Ini belum mengkalkulasi dampak perubahan kebijakan, a.l > rencana larangan ekspor utk nilai kalori tertentu. Belum > lagi Minggu lalu SBY sdh wanti-wanti untuk deregulasi sektor > pertambangan. > > Salam, > Dar > > Powered by Telkomsel BlackBerry® > From: "Bandono Salim" <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:00:18 +0000 > To: Iagi<[email protected]> > > > ReplyTo: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [iagi-net-l] Pembatalan pengembangan Olympic > Dam - akhir mining boom di Australia? > > Sebagai penghasil btbr kalori rendah dan sedang, berapa > besar dampak dari heboh di Australia? Salam. > Powered by Telkomsel BlackBerry® > From: git sulistiono <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:39:00 -0700 (PDT) > To: [email protected]<[email protected]> > ReplyTo: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [iagi-net-l] Pembatalan pengembangan Olympic > Dam - akhir mining boom di Australia? > > > > Menurut beberapa laporan, industri baja di Cina mengalami > penurunan produksi berhubung demand juga turun. Selain itu > ternyata Cina telah menumpuk iron ore dalam jumlah besar. > Penurunan volume produksi baja Cina akan berpengaruh > juga pada ekspor coking coal dari Australia. Menurut > beberapa rekan, produsen batubara Australia juga mulai > mengambil langkah2 antisipatif (mungkin Noel bisa > menjelaskan lebih detail). Sampai pagi ini di media > Australia perdebatan mengenai akhir mining boom masih seru > salam > Prianggito > > > > > > From: F. Hasan Sidi <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, 24 August 2012 11:18 AM > Subject: Re: [iagi-net-l] Pembatalan pengembangan Olympic > Dam - akhir mining boom di Australia? > > > > Ini kan baru melihat ke-ekonomik-an dari sisi investor > (supply) dimana BHP sendiri juga melihat cash-flow mereka > dan membandingkan Olympic Dam dengan project mereka yang > lain. Di sisi "demand", China masih belum menutup keran > impor mereka toh? > FHS > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:33 PM, git sulistiono > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Keputusan BHP Billiton untuk mempetieskan rencana > pengembangan operasinya di Olympic Dam, South > Australia telah memicu debat yg panas di Australia sejak > kemarin. Intinya: apakah era mining boom yg kali ini telah > berakhir? > sumber: > http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/bhp-cancels-30-billion-olympic-dam-expansion-in-south-australian-outback/story-fncynkc6-1226455884519> > > salam > Prianggito > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________> > BHP Billiton's decision to shelve its proposed $30 billion > Olympic Dam expansion has triggered a federal war of words > over the country's mining boom. > > Resources Minister Martin Ferguson triggered the debate this > morning when he told ABC Radio: "You've got to understand, > the resources boom is over. We've done well." > > But that view was not supported by Finance Minister Senator > Penny Wong. > > Senator Wong, when asked whether she agreed with Mr > Ferguson, told ABC TV: "No, I think the mining boom has got > a long way to run." > > Senator Wong used the interview to accuse Opposition Leader > Tony Abbott of running a dishonest fear campaign about the > Olympic Dam decision. > > Mr Abbott has said the government's mining and carbon taxes > are partly to blame for the company's decision. > > BHP had been warning the two taxes were making Australia a > less competitive place to invest, he said. > > Senator Wong said Mr Abbott was asking Australians to > believe what he said was true even though BHP had cited > other reasons for its decision. > > "This is one of the most dishonest, self-interested fear > campaigns that we have seen in Australian politics," Senator > Wong told ABC TV. > > Senator Wong's comments triggered a concerted response from > the Opposition, with Nationals Senate leader Barnaby Joyce > saying it was "ridiculous" to suggest the carbon and mining > taxes played no part in the decision to scrap the project. > > "The question today is how could you possibly argue that a > new tax that will be paid by the company is not an issue in > the decision they make?" Senator Joyce told reporters in > Canberra this morning. > > "Do we think for one second that this (carbon and mining > taxes) wasn't an issue that was discussed around board > tables at BHP and every other resource company in the world? > > "Expenses such as these become part and parcel of the > decisions you make." > > Liberal senator Simon Birmingham said BHP's decision was the > biggest blow to business confidence in SA since the State > Bank disaster of the 1990s. > > "This is a blow that potentially could have been avoided," > he said, adding that government policies certainly did not > help. > > They definitely had hurt the prospects of the project going > ahead, Senator Birmingham said. > > "They will be paying enormous additional taxes, funds they > could have been investing in the Olympic Dam project." > > BHP shelves Olympic Dam expansion > > BHP Billiton has shelved $US50 billion ($A47.89 billion) of > major projects in a major cost-slashing program > > Liberal MP Rowan Ramsey said he was disappointed a resources > minister would make such a comment, but conceded things were > getting tough in the sector. > > "Let's get out there and speak with a bit of confidence and > say that we want to deliver some of these projects," Mr > Ramsey told reporters. > > Opposition resources spokesman Ian Macfarlane said Mr > Ferguson's comments highlighted the bad timing of new taxes > being imposed on the sector. > > Assistant Treasurer David Bradbury said Mr Abbott had been > "caught out lying". > > He said the opposition leader admitted he had not read the > BHP statement about the project's cancellation before > calling a press conference to blame the decision on the > carbon and mining taxes. > > "Even a very peripheral reading of the material ... would > suggest that these were factors that were not in play in the > decision," Mr Bradbury said. > > He also accused Mr Abbott of suggesting BHP had misled > investors and the market "by not providing a full and frank > disclosure of the reasons surrounding their decision". > > "What we have here is a leader of the opposition who will > allow no fact, no law, no personal company's reputation to > ever get in the way of his reckless and irresponsible scare > campaign," Mr Bradbury said. > > Mr Abbott today denied not reading the BHP statement, > telling reporters in Canberra he read it at 3.45pm (AEST) > yesterday. > > When quizzed about the apparent contradiction between this > and what he'd said on ABC TV's 7.30 program, the opposition > leader said he was responding to a different question from > compere Leigh Sales. Mr Macfarlane said he gave Mr Abbott a > "very good briefing" on BPH's announcement. "The reality is > that he (Mr Abbott) was already aware that the cost of > removing the overburden in Olympic Dam is more than $50 > million as a result of the carbon tax," Mr Macfarlane told > reporters in Canberra. "Yesterday's decision is further > proof that this government is driving investors away from > the resource sector in Australia." In the statement, BHP > Billiton chief Marius Kloppers said the company was not > going ahead with the massive open cut pit because of current > market conditions including subdued commodity prices and > higher capital costs. Despite seven years' work - and with > government approvals in place - the global mining giant's > board decided the economics of the project did not stack up > as planned. Instead it will continue work on using different > technologies and less expensive ways to reach the copper, > gold and uranium ore buried hundreds of metres below ground > in South Australia's Far North. "We want to find the right > solution to unlock this resource," said Mr Kloppers. > However, BHP immediately began to lay off workers as it put > the project on the backburner and as its existing > underground mine cuts back because of lower commodity > prices. South Australian Premier Jay Weatherill said the > decision was an "enormous disappointment". The indenture > agreement between the South Australian Government and BHP > will lapse on December 15, so any future mine expansion plan > will need to be renegotiated, including the company's > generous 45-year deal on royalties. "The community will be > expecting us to learn from our experience," Mr Weatherill > said. The expansion had been factored into the State Budget > but Mr Weatherill said it was too early to quantify the loss > to the SA economy. He said it reinforced the need to > strengthen other sectors, especially advanced manufacturing > where projects such as the next-generation submarines will > be game-changers. Mr Weatherill denied that the move > signalled SA had missed the mining boom, saying others mines > were still being developed and SA was on track to export $10 > billion in minerals by 2020 - excluding the Olympic Dam > expansion or new petroleum projects. Mr Kloppers said the > State Government, the Opposition and the Federal Government > had been "fantastic" partners and did all they could to > assist the project. "The SA community has also been > extraordinarily strong in its support," he said. "However, > the capital expenditure equation at this moment in time has > changed. What has happened with Olympic Dam is that the > economics of the concept have changed - because of > construction costs changing, the Australian dollar changing, > the copper price, the uranium outlook changing and so on." > Mr Kloppers would not say how much costs had escalated for > Olympic Dam but by comparison, noted that costs in WA had > risen sevenfold in the past 10 years. He said BHP was still > investing - allocating $US23 billion to 20 projects - but > could only do so much. BHP has also scaled back its West > Australian iron ore plans. > Mr Kloppers said BHP's approach would not, on its own, take > the heat out of the national boom, but with other players > also easing back, industry costs would fall. Asked whether > the federal mineral resources rent tax and other taxes has > scuppered the project, Mr Kloppers said the changes were on > a bigger scale. "The decision is almost wholly associated > with, in the first instance, capital costs," he said. "The > MRRT only covers coal and iron ore not copper, not gold and > not uranium." BHP Billiton's chief executive of non-ferrous > metals Andrew Mackenzie emphasised that the decision was > based on global forces. Mr Mackenzie, who heads the miner's > worldwide operations in copper and other base metals, said > BHP was not abandoning Olympic Dam. "It is still a fantastic > ore body based on a number of commodities, principally > copper and also uranium and gold where we think demand will > remain strong and grow," he said. "We will continue to study > it. While we were working on this project we've been trying > to develop a number of new technologies which we think will > substantially improve the competitiveness of the project to > win funding (from the BHP board). "They were always going to > be used at a later stage but if we pull them through earlier > then we believe we can create a more compelling project. "It > will probably be a smaller project but one offering a more > attractive set of returns. We believe SA is a great place to > invest and do business." The new techniques would change the > processing method from crushing and concentrating the ore to > heaping piles of ore and then dissolving out the minerals by > leaching. This would enable a smaller pit to be built > initially, with ore gradually added instead of building a > large processing plant. Also on the agenda would be remotely > operated machinery although, at first, manual operations > would be needed, Mr Mackenzie said. BHP president of uranium > and head of SA operations Dean Dalla Valle said work would > continue. "We are still committing significant funds and > investment," he said. "All the technology work will be done > in SA - in Adelaide or on site." BHP BILLITON'S STATEMENT > BHP Billiton announced today that it will investigate an > alternative, less capital-intensive design of the Olympic > Dam open-pit expansion, involving new technologies, to > substantially improve the economics of the project. As a > result it will not be ready to approve an expansion of > Olympic Dam before the Indenture agreement deadline of 15 > December 2012. The Company will discuss the implications of > this decision for the Indenture agreement with the South > Australian Government in the coming months. BHP Billiton > CEO, Marius Kloppers, said current market conditions, > including subdued commodity prices and higher capital costs, > had led to the decision: "As we finalised all the details of > the project in the context of current market conditions, our > strategy and capital management priorities, it became clear > that the right decision for the Company and its shareholders > was to continue studies to develop a less capital intensive > option to replace the underground mine at Olympic Dam. "As > with any capital commitment, all investment options are > scrutinised as they move through our approvals process and > our highest returning projects are prioritised. Value is > always our primary consideration. We believe todays decision > reflects an appropriate, prudent and disciplined course of > action. "However, the long term outlook for the copper > market remains strong and we will continue to work closely > with all stakeholders as we refine our longer term > development plans for this unique, world class ore body. We > want to find the right solution to unlock this resource," he > said. BHP Billiton Chief Executive Non-Ferrous, Andrew > Mackenzie, said the South Australian Governments support for > the project should be commended: "The South Australian > Government has been fully supportive of Olympic Dam and has > created an environment that is highly conducive to business > investment. We have been very much encouraged by their > attitude to business development and the Olympic Dam > expansion project. "Olympic Dam is a resource of enormous > potential and we will continue to work on technological and > design alternatives that have the potential to substantially > improve the economics of the expansion, while also > completing some early stage site works." As a result of this > change, the Company will recognise impairment and other > charges of US$346 million before tax (US$242 million after > tax) in respect of the Olympic Dam Project in the 2012 > financial year. ------------------------------------- > SOUTH AUSTRALIAN PREMIER JAY WEATHERILL'S STATEMENT > I have been advised by BHPB of the decision of their Board > to defer the Olympic Dam expansion project to allow the > development of a new mine plan based on new technologies > which will involve capital efficiencies for consideration by > the Board. BHPB have requested that discussions with the > State Government concerning the implications of this > decision for the indenture agreement take place as soon as > possible. There is no doubt this is a major disappointment > for South Australia and the nation.- especially for those > workers and businesses who had set themselves to work on the > expansion project. It is also a particular disappointment > for the regional towns like Roxby Downs, Port Augusta, Port > Pirie and Whyalla who had started to experience the benefits > in activity that this expansion was bringing. As BHPB have > made clear today, this decision is based on global factors > quite outside our control - South Australia and the > Commonwealth have done everything in our power to provide > the circumstances for the project to proceed - a point > acknowledged by BHPB. What I want to say to South > Australians is that these resources are world class. They > are still there. They belong to us, and they will be > developed. > What I have explained to BHPB is that beyond their > regulatory approvals, they also need community permission to > develop this resource. Given that this is the second time > they have disappointed South Australians, there can be no > doubt that this community permission will come at a cost. I > have been told by BHPB that they wish to proceed with an > expansion. They have told me that they need to do this in > the coming years because the life of the underground mine is > finite, and there are clear advantages to them of retaining > the environmental approvals that are already in place. They > have told me that they will continue the site preparation > work at Olympic Dam, and engineering works to ensure that > they are ready to proceed in a major way. They have told me > that they will undertake a series of pilot tests on the new > technologies that will assist them to bring this project on. > The discussions BHPB have requested with the South > Australian Government will take place over the coming weeks, > and will need to be concluded before the end of the year. ___________________________________________________________ indomail - Your everyday mail - http://indomail.indo.net.id -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PP-IAGI 2011-2014: Ketua Umum: Rovicky Dwi Putrohari, rovicky[at]gmail.com Sekjen: Senoaji, ajiseno[at]ymail.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jangan lupa PIT IAGI 2012 di Jogjakarta tanggal 17-20 September 2012. Kirim abstrak ke email: pit.iagi.2012[at]gmail.com. Batas akhir pengiriman abstrak 28 Februari 2012. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to: iagi-net-unsubscribe[at]iagi.or.id To subscribe, send email to: iagi-net-subscribe[at]iagi.or.id For topics not directly related to Geology, users are advised to post the email to: [email protected] Visit IAGI Website: http://iagi.or.id Pembayaran iuran anggota ditujukan ke: Bank Mandiri Cab. Wisma Alia Jakarta No. Rek: 123 0085005314 Atas nama: Ikatan Ahli Geologi Indonesia (IAGI) Bank BCA KCP. Manara Mulia No. Rekening: 255-1088580 A/n: Shinta Damayanti IAGI-net Archive 1: http://www.mail-archive.com/iagi-net%40iagi.or.id/ IAGI-net Archive 2: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iagi --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: IAGI disclaims all warranties with regard to information posted on its mailing lists, whether posted by IAGI or others. In no event shall IAGI or its members be liable for any, including but not limited to direct or indirect damages, or damages of any kind whatsoever, resulting from loss of use, data or profits, arising out of or in connection with the use of any information posted on IAGI mailing list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
