[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-73?page=comments#action_62473 ]
     
Brandon Goodin commented on IBATIS-73:
--------------------------------------

My preference here is to remove the Spring dependency and resolve it in some 
other fashion. None of our other caches have the need to hook into Spring. 
Being that i have used Spring with iBatis with no need for placing Spring in 
the internals of iBatis I have a strong sense of unease doing it here. I feel 
as though it would bring an unwelcome presidence into the mix. If we provide 
Spring hooks then others might feel then need to have [name your favorite IoC 
container here] hooks. Unless there are some significant objections, I am going 
to rework this to be more like the other Caches and leave the Spring 
integration to Spring. I am also not keen on the use of System.getProperty for 
setting the TypeFactory implemetation. That should be set elsewhere (a config 
setting in iBatis). I think we can take this contribution and rework it to 
provide Ales with what he needs and keep Spring out of iBatis as well. Thoughts?

> EHCache for iBatis
> ------------------
>
>          Key: IBATIS-73
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-73
>      Project: iBatis for Java
>         Type: New Feature
>   Components: SQL Maps
>     Versions: 2.0.9
>     Reporter: Ales Justin
>  Attachments: ehcache_patch.zip, ehcache_patch_2.zip
>
> I have written a EHCache (http://ehcache.sourceforge.net/) implementation of 
> CacheController.
> If there is any interest for this patch, I can send it or put it somewhere.
> Rgds, Ales

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to