On 4/21/05, Brandon Goodin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good idea, I will look into that, and verify the behavior - that is how it should work.
I like that better than the existing check. It may be slower, but the behavior seems to be more what I would expect.
>"Second was that cache models are processed even if cacheModelsEnabled is false.
I would think it should not process. But, you would want to check the
other areas where the statement has a cachemodel specified and make
sure that when the configs are processed it also knows to use a
GenericStatement/ProcedureStatement rather than a CachingStatement.
Good idea, I will look into that, and verify the behavior - that is how it should work.
"The next one was that the BaseParser's applyNamespace(id) method does
not apply the namespace if the id passed in has a "." in it.
I can't think of a reason why we wouldn't want to do this. These nodes
are processed once. There should be no multi processing. Besides, if
there was you could always check for a startsWith(namespace+".").
I like that better than the existing check. It may be slower, but the behavior seems to be more what I would expect.
Larry
