On 5/16/05, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > On 5/16/05, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Vote now or forever hold your peace.
:) I know we're having fun here :) ... but, for the record, if a problem is found with a distribution at any time, we should "not hold our peace". We should immediately downgrade the release and roll another that fixes the problem. ;) Unfortunately, I don't have a Java application in production against which to test the distribution, so I will have to abstain from the quality vote :( Do we have another PPMC member that has tested the distribution and can +1 it, so we have the minimum quorum of three? We could then pass the vote by the Incubator PMC and make this an official ASF release. And, just to nitpick, before the quality vote, we should try to use the word "distribution" or "milestone rather than "release". In the ASF lexicon, the word "release" implies that it's been approved by the project PMC and the community at large. Here, we've rolled an alpha distribution, that is on track for being an official release. -Ted. > > > > +1 > > > > Cheers, > > Clinton > > >
