We can just jump ahead and do a 1.2.1 distribution insead. The process is meant to be light. We can roll the next distribution whenever we want, and vote on its quality whenever we want.
We can vote on a distribution as soon as there is a distribution to vote on, so if Gilles rolled a 1.2.1 tonight, we could vote on it tonight, and have a 1.2.1 beta by morning. If the releases were coming very close together, we could also skip straight to General Availablility. -Ted. On 6/8/05, Gilles Bayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'am thinking passing this version from ALPHA to BETA and do a new BETA to > support the new build and the new guide. > I don't know if the BETA binaries can be different from the ALPHA binaries, > if so we will do a new binaries fro BETA. > > If Ted can ask us what is the best to do ? > > On 6/8/05, Roberto R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Gilles. > > > > Sorry for the email, but does this vote just change the release status of > the current ALPHA build to BETA (instead of creating a new build with the > new DomSqlMapBuilder() constructor and DataMapper/DataAccess guide updates > that is tagged as BETA? > > > > Roberto > > > > > > > > On 6/8/05, Gilles Bayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > We wanted to upgrade the quality of DataMapper 1.2.0 and DataAccess > 1.6.0 to [BETA]. > > > Here's my +1. > > > > > > -Gilles > > > > > > -- HTH, Ted.
