I've tried hardcoding the values to be DateTime.MinValue, and I still
get the same error. I am using the OleDB provider.
Rahul
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:53:15 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I've never seen an arithmetic overflow error before.
>
> Is it possible that your timer values are going past DateTime.MaxValue ?
>
> -Ted.
>
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:37:52 -0500, Rahul Singh wrote:
> > Ted,
> >
> > I think i know where you are coming from, but let's say I have this
> > representing my properties in my model, what changes would you make
> > to make this work? I think I may be having a senile moment, but i'd
> > greatly appreciate your help.
> >
> > Rahul
> >
> > "
> > protected DateTime _lastTimerStart;
> > protected DateTime _lastTimerStop;
> >
> > public DateTime LastTimerStart
> > {
> > get {return _lastTimerStart;}
> > set {_lastTimerStart = value;}
> > }
> >
> > public DateTime LastTimerStop
> > {
> > get {return _lastTimerStop;}
> > set {_lastTimerStop = value;}
> > }"
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 07:21:02 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:17:49 -0500, Rahul Singh wrote:
> >>
> >>> "The statement has been terminated. Arithmetic overflow error
> >>> converting expression to data type datetime. "
> >>>
> >>> How do you guys deal with DateTime values as your object
> >>> properties? I'm getting this error when I try to insert the
> >>> object.
> >>>
> >>> Rahul
> >>>
> >> At the moment, I have the model object convert the value back and
> >> forth between a string representation and a binary
> >> representation. The model object has a separate property for the
> >> string representation that do the conversion and pass the binary
> >> to the actual Date property. (So there is no private string
> >> field, just the binary.) The data access methods use the binary
> >> property. The controls use the string property. The string
> >> methods also watch for the magic null strings, and return blanks
> >> to the controls.
> >>
> >> Next, I'm going to refactor for the Spring Framework, which I
> >> believe has a lot of conversion utilities built in. Spring is
> >> widely used by the Java community, and I expect we'll find the
> >> same on the .NET side soon.
> >>
> >> [http://www.springframework.net/]
> >>
> >> -Ted.
>
>
