Yes. Although posts like this:

 http://blogs.msdn.com/kcwalina/archive/2005/05/18/419203.aspx

lead me to believe that some of the finer details are still up in the
air.

--- Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Isn't this going to be much easier in .NET 2.0 with the introduction
> of generics? I know it is currently that way with Java in JDK 5.
> 
> Java:
> List <MyObject> = new ArrayList<MyObject>();
> 
> Apparently the C# notation is identical.


> 
> Brandon
> 
> On 5/23/05, Chad Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Resharper can do all this and more!  (insert deeply convincing
> > argument to switch here).   It supports the same type of generation
> > via Live Templates
> > (http://www.jetbrains.com/resharper/features/liveTemplates.html).
> > You would need to create a Live Template for your Custom Collection
> > but the same result is achievable.
> > 
> > I suppose since everyone else is throwing their custom collection
> code
> > in I'll bring mine out.  I enjoy the CustomCollectionBase I
> created.
> > Implementation is very simple (basically copy/paste).  A
> > CustomCollection that uses it would look something like this:
> > 
> > using System;
> > using SuperSecret.Collections.Filters;
> > using SuperSecret.Domain;
> > 
> > namespace SuperSecret.Collections
> > {
> >         [Serializable()]
> >         public class SecretCollection : CustomCollectionBase
> >         {
> >                 public SecretCollection():base(typeof(Secret)){}
> >                 public void Add(Secret o){InnerList.Add(o);}
> >                 public void Remove(Secret o){InnerList.Remove(o);}
> >                 public new Secret this[int index]
> >                 {
> >                         get{return((Secret)List[index]);}
> >                         set{List[index] = value;}
> >                 }
> >                 public new Secret FindOne(PropertyFilter cfSearch)
> >                 {
> >                         return (Secret)base.FindOne(cfSearch);
> >                 }
> >                 public new SecretCollection FindMany(PropertyFilter
> cfSearch)
> >                 {
> >                         return
> (SecretCollection)base.FindMany(cfSearch);
> >                 }
> >         }
> > }
> > 
> > Anyway, you can pretty much accomplish this type of generation via
> who
> > knows how many ways so hopefully this thread will give people more
> > information on the different ways out there.
> > 
> > -Chad
> > 
> > On 5/23/05, Ron Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've seen that. I think my app is faster when you need to
> generate 20
> > > collections at once. Using the VS.Net template method, you need
> to
> > > repeat the same step 20 times. Not to mention the time it takes
> to
> > > click through all the menus. Even with using keyboard shortcuts
> its
> > > still a pain. Their templates just extend CollectionBase. The
> template
> > > I'm using includes xml comments along with a bunch of other
> "stuff".
> > > Plus some corporate environments have their Windows machines
> locked
> > > down and altering Visual Studio is not always an option.
> > >
> > > The way I do it now (using QuickCodes) is that I type this on a
> line:
> > >
> > >  coll Product
> > >
> > > and press Alt-Q and it generates the collection.
> > >
> > > Does ReSharper allow you to generate things like that? Everyone
> keeps
> > > nagging me to switch over to it :)
> > >
> > > --- Gilles Bayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Even better,
> > > > http://weblogs.asp.net/egarmon/archive/2003/11/13/37383.aspx
> > > > Just create a collection from VS.NET <http://VS.NET> as a
> class.
> > > >
> > > >  On 5/23/05, Ron Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Others may find this useful...
> > > > >
> > > > > Since IBatisNet plays well with strongly typed collections, I
> wrote
> > > > a
> > > > > small tool to help me create strongly typed collections:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.ronosaurus.com/IBatisNet/collgen/
> > > > >
> > > > > Basically I enter the name of my entity objects in the
> TextBox (one
> > > > per
> > > > > line, as many as I want):
> > > > >
> > > > > Product
> > > > > Category
> > > > >
> > > > > and it generates a .zip file on-the-fly containing:
> > > > >
> > > > > ProductCollection
> > > > > CategoryCollection
> > > > >
> > > > > The ProductCollection consists of the following items:
> > > > >
> > > > > Interface IProductCollection
> > > > > Interface IProductList
> > > > > Interface IProductEnumerator
> > > > > Class ProductCollection
> > > > >
> > > > > There is also support for collections being in a different
> > > > namespace
> > > > > than the entity objects.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is an example output file:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
http://www.ronosaurus.com/IBatisNet/collgen/StonglyTypedCollections.zip
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, I am aware of Code Smith and QuickCode. In fact the
> template
> > > > > collection came from a QuickCode submission. If you need more
> > > > > functionality than what my single one form app does, by all
> means
> > > > use
> > > > > Code Smith or QuickCode.
> > > > >
> > > > > What's nice about generating collections this way is that I
> can
> > > > have my
> > > > > browser open up the generated .zip file after its done
> downloading
> > > > then
> > > > > I simply drag the .cs files into Visual Studio. No need to
> open
> > > > another
> > > > > program, select a template, type things into it, generate the
> > > > files,
> > > > > then close out of everything.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe I'll allow the user to specify what type of collection
> they
> > > > want:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > simple: just extend CollectionBase
> > > > > advanced: all the bells and whistles (how it is now)
> > > > >
> > > > > - Ron
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 

Reply via email to