...of course, "new RowHandler" should have been some implementation....
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 09:08:39 -0700, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Emiliano, > > I've found a good design that works for me. I consider RowHandlers a > "one time use" object. So what I do is pass any additional > information to the RowHandler as a constructor parameter. So you > might have something like: > > ... > RowHandler rowHandler = new RowHandler (param1, param2, param3); > sqlMap.queryWithRowHandler(id, parameterObject, rowHandler) > ... > > This way the RowHandler has all the information it needs, without > complicating the SQL Maps API (and is a better overall design). > > Cheers, > Clinton > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 08:52:27 -0700, Brandon Goodin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can use queryWithRowHandler. > > > > "but I've got to process every row in the result set using" - yep this > > can be done queryWithRowHandler(String id, Object parameterObject, > > RowHandler rowHandler) > > > > "other input parameters passed to queryForList so: how can I pass them > > to rowHandler" - yep. the second argument of the queryWithRowHandler > > is your parameterObject. > > > > Brandon > > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:21:34 +0100, Emiliano Armellin > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > a question about RowHandler's use: it takes only one parameter, the Object > > > wich represent the result set row, and process it, ok > > > > > > but I've got to process every row in the result set using, also, other > > > input > > > parameters passed to queryForList so: how can I pass them to rowHandler? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Emiliano Armellin > > > W_www.ateikon.com > > > @[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > T_ > > > +39 0422 452101 > > > > > >
