Both are good suggestions (please add them to JIRA). The reason behind why there hasn't been much development or evolution around Parameter Maps is twofold:
1) They're a lot simpler than result maps, and require less configuration. 2) Very few people use the <parameterMap> element. You can do everything with inline parameters now (#prop,attr1=val1,att2=val2# etc.). I'm dreaming of a day when both the <parameterMap> and <resultMap> elements disappear! Cheers, Clinton On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:34:55 -0800 (PST), Kris Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why can you extends a result map but not a parameter map? Also, why can't > you map a parameter in a parameter map to a specific database column so that > order doesn't matter. This would allow you to do things like define a > paramter map for an entire class and then only select the parts that are > required for the specific statement you are interested in. > > Kris > > ________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' > >
