I believe we already answered your question...this is the second thread you've posted on the subject, no?
Clinton On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:13:31 +1100, Huy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Clinton Begin wrote: > >>>Looosly typed! > > > > > > That's not loose typing. It's NO typing. > > > > The type that's missing isn't what you think it is. The type that's > > missing is your domain class definition. You don't have types at all. > > You just have collections of implicitly related information. > > > > In any case, I appreciate your heavy, thorough testing of our Map > > support (seriously actually). ;-) > > > > Cheers, > > Clinton > > > > Now that you guys have concluded that map usage is not desirable ( I > totally agree), is there any chance of answering my original question > about the flexible resultmaps ? > > Thanks. > > Huy >
