Great! I will give it a try.
What do you suggest when you have ambiguously defined column names in a n+1 query?
nathan On Feb 9, 2005, at 10:30 AM, Clinton Begin wrote:
If you can join the data into a single resultset with repeating groups, the N+1 solution will work, no matter how the collections are arranged.
As long as you group by some column in table_a, you can separately map 2 collections on the same class.
This will work.
Try it out!
Clinton
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:21:54 -0700, Nathan Maves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I dont think that the current implementation will work for this but I was looking for some best practices on how to do it.
Parent Class A has n number of List properties that all come for their own tables.
A from table_a List of B from table_b List of C from table_c . . .
Nathan
