http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0502cline/
iBatis is not a stranger for "big players" (e.g.: IBM) In fact they (IBM) produced docs about integration with their products.
Not to say that IBM supports iBatis, but they certainly find it not "totally unsuitable" for their architecture.
Kaushik Ashodiya wrote:
To some level Hibernate is a valid candidate for evaluation (taking into account that it is driving the EJB spec). But again, my business acumen says that IBM will definitely take care of that.
(...)
Isn't the whole idea of going with some big commercial vendor like IBM to consolidate your infrastructure source so that you dont knock on different doors?
(...)
Short of long: I would recommend usage of vendor supported spec based ejb conatiner for applications needing persistance or transaction management. Eventually these will be simplified (if there is fear of complexity....thats an issue the specs and the commercial vendors like IBM will definitely answer).
(...)
<http://www.insac.com/>
