On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 08:28:49AM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025, at 3:35 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2025, Mark Pearson wrote:
... > >> + serial = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_SERIAL); > >> + if (!serial) > >> + return -EINVAL; > > > > This should not return -EINVAL as it is not a problem with the input > > parameters. Perhaps -ENODEV would make sense instead? > > Good point. > Unless Andy strongly thinks I should drop this bit, I'll fix in the next > version If maintainers are okay to take this approach (both Kconfig and C file changes), I am fine. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
